Invited Commentary |

The Continuing Challenge of Turning Promising Observational Evidence About Risk for Dementia to Evidence Supporting Prevention

Carole Dufouil, PhD1; Carol Brayne, MD2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Centre U897 and Clinical Investigation Centre EC7, Institut de Santé Publique, d’Épidémiologie et de Développement, Bordeaux University, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (Pole de Sante Publique), INSERM, Bordeaux, France
2Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(3):333-335. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7674.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


As our society ages, we fear the onset of dementia and Alzheimer disease (AD) every time we forget the name of a person we are sure we once knew. Hard evidence for prevention and causation of dementia remains elusive.1 Models have shown that primary prevention of risks appears more effective for population outcomes than screening or treatment.2 Evidence from observational population-based studies3 suggests that vascular risk factors, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), are associated with brain changes, and research on the causes of dementia remains a priority. Trials for prevention of vascular dementia and AD are challenging, requiring many years and many participants for interventions that need to start in middle-aged or younger populations with decades of follow-up. To try to obtain evidence more quickly, attention has focused on surrogate markers (eg, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain), evolution of cognitive tests, and β-amyloid biomarkers.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Resolution

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Scenario