<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Internal Medicine: Thromboembolism/Anticoagulation Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:47:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archinte.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archinte.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Use of Glucocorticoids and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism A Nationwide Population-Based Case-Control Study  Glucocorticoids and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism </title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1673744</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Johannesdottir SA, Horváth-Puhó E, Dekkers OM, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Importance&lt;/div&gt;Excess endogenous cortisol has been linked to venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, but whether this relationship applies to exogenous glucocorticoids remains uncertain. Because the prevalence of glucocorticoid use and the incidence of VTE are high, an increased risk of VTE associated with glucocorticoid use would have important implications.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Background&lt;/div&gt;To examine the association between glucocorticoid use and VTE.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Population-based case-control study using nationwide databases.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;Denmark (population 5.6 million).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;We identified 38 765 VTE cases diagnosed from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2011, and 387 650 population controls included through risk-set sampling and matched by birth year and sex. The VTE diagnosis date for the case was the index date for cases and matched controls.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Exposure&lt;/div&gt;We classified individuals who filled their most recent glucocorticoid prescription 90 days or less, 91 to 365 days, and more than 365 days before the index date as present, recent, and former users, respectively. Present users were subdivided into new (first-ever prescription 90 days or less before the index date) and continuing users (others).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcomes and Measures&lt;/div&gt;We used conditional logistic regression adjusted for VTE risk factors to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs for glucocorticoid users vs nonusers.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Systemic glucocorticoids increased VTE risk among present (adjusted IRR, 2.31; 95% CI, 2.18-2.45), new (3.06; 2.77-3.38), continuing (2.02; 1.88-2.17), and recent (1.18; 1.10-1.26) users but not among former users (0.94; 0.90-0.99). The adjusted IRR increased from 1.00 (95% CI, 0.93-1.07) for a prednisolone-equivalent cumulative dose of 10 mg or less to 1.98 (1.78-2.20) for more than 1000 to 2000 mg, and to 1.60 (1.49-1.71) for doses higher than 2000 mg. New use of inhaled (adjusted IRR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.72-2.86) and intestinal-acting (2.17; 1.27-3.71) glucocorticoids also increased VTE risk.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions and Relevance&lt;/div&gt;The risk of VTE is increased among glucocorticoid users. Although residual confounding may partly explain this finding, we consider a biological mechanism likely because the association followed a clear temporal gradient, persisted after adjustment for indicators of severity of underlying disease, and existed also for noninflammatory conditions. Hence, our observations merit clinical attention.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">173</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">9</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">743</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">752</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.122</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1673744</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In This Issue of JAMA Internal Medicine</title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687651</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author />
      <description />
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">173</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">9</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">722</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">722</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.51</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687651</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Resumption of Warfarin Therapy After Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding: Benefit or Bias?</title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687667</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Filion KB, Assayag J, Azoulay L. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;It is with great interest that we read the article by Witt and colleagues, who examined the risk of thromboembolism, recurrent hemorrhage, and death in a retrospective cohort of warfarin users with gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Although no difference was observed in recurrent hemorrhage, the authors found that warfarin therapy resumption after gastrointestinal tract bleeding resulted in substantial decreases in thrombosis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.58) and death (adjusted HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.62). In contrast, a participant-level meta-analysis estimated that oral anticoagulants reduce the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation by 52% (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.37-0.63) but not death (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.13) relative to aspirin.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">173</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">9</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">833</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">834</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3763</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687667</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Resumption of Warfarin Therapy After Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding: Benefit or Bias?—Reply</title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687668</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Witt DM, Delate T, Crowther MA. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;In reply&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">173</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">9</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">833</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">834</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687668</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndromes: What Does a Meta-analysis Tell Us?</title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687671</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Kwong JW, Yu C. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;We read with interest the meta-analysis by Komócsi et al, which reported that the use of factor Xa and direct thrombin inhibitors in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was associated with a substantial increase in major bleeding and moderate reduction in ischemic events. However, there are a few issues we would like to highlight.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">173</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">9</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">835</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">836</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.78</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687671</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndromes: What Does a Meta-analysis Tell Us?—Reply</title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687672</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Komócsi A, Vorobcsuk A, Aradi D. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;In reply&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">173</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">9</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">835</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">836</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.424</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>