<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Internal Medicine: Quality of Care Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:46:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archinte.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archinte.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Effect of the ACGME 16-Hour Rule on Efficiency and Quality of Care: Duty Hours 2.0</title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1673750</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Choma NN, Vasilevskis EE, Sponsler KC, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;In July 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) reduced the consecutive number of hours that postgraduate year-1 residents can work in a single shift, from 30 to 16. This rule was intended to improve patient safety by reducing residents' fatigue. Many worry that the new duty hour policy increases patient care handovers, which may cause patient harm. The net effect of the 16-hour duty limits on patient outcomes is uncertain.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">173</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">9</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">819</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">821</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3014</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1673750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>