<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Internal Medicine: Dialysis Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 17:45:58 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archinte.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archinte.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Relationship Between the Prognostic Expectations of Seriously Ill Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis and Their Nephrologists Prognostic Expectations of Hemodialysis Patients </title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1691764</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Wachterman MW, Marcantonio ER, Davis RB, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Importance&lt;/div&gt;Patients undergoing hemodialysis have an annual mortality rate exceeding 20%, comparable to many types of cancer. Past research has shown that patients with cancer overestimate their likelihood of survival relative to their physicians, but this relationship has not been examined in patients with noncancer diagnoses. Perceptions of prognosis and transplant candidacy may influence goals of care.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objectives&lt;/div&gt;To compare the perceptions of hemodialysis patients and their nephrologists concerning prognosis and the likelihood of transplant; to follow actual survival; and to explore the relationship between patients' expectations and their goals of care.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;We completed a medical record abstraction to estimate 1-year mortality risk among patients who underwent dialysis at any time from November 1, 2010, through September 1, 2011. We then conducted in-person interviews with eligible patients whose predicted 1-year mortality, based on validated prognostic tools, was at least 20%. We also interviewed their nephrologists. We compared patients' and physicians' expectations about 1- and 5-year survival and transplant candidacy and measured the association between patients' expectations and goals of care. We then followed actual survival using Kaplan-Meier methods.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;Two dialysis units in Boston.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;Two hundred seven patients undergoing hemodialysis included in the medical record review, with 62 eligible patients interviewed.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcomes and Measures&lt;/div&gt;Predicted 1-year mortality risk using validated prognostic tools; actual survival; patients' and physicians' expectations about 1-year survival and likelihood of transplant; and patients' goals of care.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Of the 207 hemodialysis patients, 72.5% had a predicted 1-year mortality of at least 20%. Of the 80 patients eligible for interview, 62 participated (response rate, 78%). Patients were significantly more optimistic than their nephrologists about 1- and 5-year survival (P &lt; .001 for both) and were more likely to think they were transplant candidates (37 [66%] vs 22 [39%] [P = .008]). Of the 81% of patients reporting a 90% chance or greater of being alive at 1 year, 18 (44%) preferred care focused on extending life, even if it meant more discomfort, compared with 1 (9%) among patients reporting a lower chance of survival (P = .045). Actual survival was 93% at 1 year but decreased to 79% by 17 months and 56% by 23 months.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions and Relevance&lt;/div&gt;Hemodialysis patients are more optimistic about prognosis and transplant candidacy than their nephrologists. In our sample, patients' expectations about 1-year survival were more accurate than those of their nephrologists, but their longer-term survival expectations dramatically overestimated even their 2-year survival rates. Patients' prognostic expectations are associated with their treatment preferences. Our findings suggest the need for interventions to help providers communicate effectively with patients about prognosis.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">8</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6036</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1691764</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Overuse of Health Care Services When Less Is More . . . More or Less  Overuse of Health Care Services </title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1691771</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Lipitz-Snyderman A, Bach PB. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;There is widespread agreement that more is not always better in health care. Doing more can harm patients, generate excess costs, and defy patient preferences. All are major threats to the delivery of high-quality health care. Reflecting this notion, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Roundtable on Health Care Quality coined the term overuse in 1998, adapting the definition of an inappropriate service developed for the RAND Appropriateness Method in the 1980s. Overuse was defined as “a health care service [that] is provided under circumstances in which its potential for harm exceeds the possible benefit.”&lt;sup&gt;(p1002)&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">2</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6181</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1691771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>