<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Internal Medicine: Asthma Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:44:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archinte.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archinte.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Long-Acting β 2 -Agonist Step-off in Patients With Controlled Asthma Systematic Review With Meta-analysis  β 2 -Agonist Step-off in Controlled Asthma </title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1352787</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Brozek JL, Kraft M, Krishnan JA, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Background&lt;/div&gt;Because of concerns about the safety of long-acting β&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-agonist (LABA) use in patients with asthma, withdrawal of the LABA is recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration once asthma is controlled by combination therapy with a LABA and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing evidence supporting the discontinuation of LABA therapy once asthma control has been achieved with a combination of ICS and LABA.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Sources&lt;/div&gt;MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched (through August 2010), references of identified studies and selected narrative review articles were evaluated, registries of clinical trials were reviewed, and manufacturers of LABAs were contacted.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Study Selection&lt;/div&gt;Randomized controlled trials of discontinuation of LABA therapy in patients with asthma controlled with a combination of ICS and LABA.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Extraction&lt;/div&gt;Two reviewers independently screened each title and abstract in the initial searches and then the full text of each nominated article to extract data for analyses.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Of 1492 screened articles, only 5 trials involving patients aged 15 years or older fulfilled a priori–specified inclusion criteria. Results did not favor the LABA step-off approach compared with no change in treatment. The LABA step-off regimen increased asthma impairment, with worse Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score (mean difference [95% CI], 0.32 [0.14-0.51] points lower); worse Asthma Control Questionnaire score (0.24 [0.13-0.35] points higher); fewer symptom-free days (9.15% [1.62%-16.69%] less); and greater risk of withdrawal from study resulting from lack of efficacy or loss of asthma control (risk ratio, 3.27 [2.16-4.96]). Risk of exacerbations and deaths after LABA step-off were not evaluable because of the small number of events and short duration of follow-up.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions&lt;/div&gt;Evidence suggests that discontinuing LABA therapy in adults and older children with asthma controlled with a combination of ICSs and LABAs results in increased asthma-associated impairment. Additional trials measuring all long-term patient-important outcomes are needed.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">172</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">18</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1365</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1375</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3250</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1352787</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Black Clouds and Black Boxes Comment on “Long-Acting β 2 -Agonist Step-off in Patients With Controlled Asthma”  Black Clouds and Black Boxes </title>
      <link>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1352791</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Chan CM, Shorr AF. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;For more than a decade, black clouds have surrounded the safety of long-acting β&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-agonists (LABAs) for asthma. Several studies indicate that these agents are associated with an increased risk for asthma-related morbidity and mortality. Although these trials were flawed and the absolute increase in mortality risk with LABAs was small, it persisted in multiple analyses. Thus, there is consensus that these agents have no role as monotherapy in asthma. Qualms remain, however, about their use in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). Despite performing their own meta-analysis illustrating that coadministration of ICSs and LABAs essentially eliminated the enhanced risk related to LABA exposure, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) instituted a black box warning on LABAs. The warning states that LABAs, when given with ICSs, should be discontinued as soon as asthma control is achieved. The authors of the third Expert Panel Report of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines interpreted the data differently and did not endorse such an approach. With more than 25 million Americans having asthma, clinicians are left facing the quandary of how to manage these patients, many of whom receive suboptimal control with ICSs alone.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">172</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">18</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1375</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1376</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3650</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1352791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>