TY  - JOUR
T1  - How personal is the personal health record?: Comment on “the digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record”
AU  - Rudd P, Frei T
Y1  - 2011/03/28
N1  - 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.35
JO  - Archives of Internal Medicine
SP  - 575
EP  - 576
VL  - 171
IS  - 6
N2  - 
In this era of high medical costs, constrained resources, and outcome accountability, the PHR has emerged as a potential organizing principle. The PHR may mean different things to different people. On one extreme, the PHR exists as a provider-centric extension of the electronic medical record that includes a physician-maintained problem list, medication and allergy list, upcoming appointments, and recent test result summary.1 On the other extreme, the PHR may comprise a patient-centric, patient-maintained summary of health-related matters, even specifying advanced directives.2

SN  - 0003-9926
M3  - doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.35
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.35
ER  -