0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Independent Association of Low Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D Levels With All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality FREE

Harald Dobnig, MD; Stefan Pilz, MD; Hubert Scharnagl, PhD; Wilfried Renner, PhD; Ursula Seelhorst, MA; Britta Wellnitz, LLD; Jürgen Kinkeldei, DEng; Bernhard O. Boehm, MD; Gisela Weihrauch, MSc; Winfried Maerz, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Division of Endocrinology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (Dr Dobnig), and Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics (Drs Scharnagl, Renner, and Maerz and Ms Weihrauch), Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; and Department of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, Mannheim Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (Dr Pilz), LURIC Study Nonprofit LLC, Freiburg (Ms Seelhorst and Dr Wellnitz), Synlab Center of Laboratory Diagnostics Stuttgart, Leinfelden-Echterdingen (Dr Kinkeldei), Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulm, Ulm (Dr Boehm), and Synlab Center of Laboratory Diagnostics Heidelberg, Eppelheim (Dr Maerz), Germany.


Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1340-1349. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.12.1340.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background  In cross-sectional studies, low serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D are associated with higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and disease. This study aimed to determine whether endogenous 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels are related to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

Methods  Prospective cohort study of 3258 consecutive male and female patients (mean [SD] age, 62 [10] years) scheduled for coronary angiography at a single tertiary center. We formed quartiles according to 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels within each month of blood drawings. The main outcome measures were all-cause and cardiovascular deaths.

Results  During a median follow-up period of 7.7 years, 737 patients (22.6%) died, including 463 deaths from cardiovascular causes. Multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for patients in the lower two 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles (median, 7.6 and 13.3 ng/mL [to convert 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 2.496]) were higher for all-cause mortality (HR, 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-2.70; and HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.17-2.01; respectively) and for cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.57-3.13; and HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.29-2.58; respectively) compared with patients in the highest 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile (median, 28.4 ng/mL). Similar results were obtained for patients in the lowest 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D quartile. These effects were independent of coronary artery disease, physical activity level, Charlson Comorbidity Index, variables of mineral metabolism, and New York Heart Association functional class. Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were significantly correlated with variables of inflammation (C-reactive protein and interleukin 6 levels), oxidative burden (serum phospholipid and glutathione levels), and cell adhesion (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 levels).

Conclusions  Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels are independently associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. A causal relationship has yet to be proved by intervention trials using vitamin D.

Figures in this Article

Studies1,2 have demonstrated that low levels of vitamin D represent a problem of global dimension. A recent Workshop Consensus for Vitamin D Nutritional Guidelines3 estimated that about 50% and 60% of the older populations in North America and the rest of the world, respectively, do not have satisfactory vitamin D status. The consensus further concluded that the situation is similar in younger subjects. Reasons for this remain unclear but are likely related to factors such as urbanization, demographic shifts, decreased outdoor activity, air pollution and global dimming, and decreases in the cutaneous production of vitamin D with age. The amount of vitamin D from dietary sources is generally viewed as too insignificant in many regions of the world to have an effect on vitamin D status at the population level.3

The minimum desirable serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D has been suggested to be 20 to 30 ng/mL (to convert 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 2.496) according to the consensus conference3 and to a study4 in which the analysis was expanded to cover potential beneficial effects of vitamin D for multiple health outcomes. Low levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D are clearly related to compromised bone mineral density,5 to falls6 and fractures,7 and to diminished lower extremity function. In addition to higher incidences of cancer8 and immune dysfunction,9 low levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D have been recently linked to the presence of cardiovascular disease,10,11 hypertension,12 and the metabolic syndrome.13 Results of recent nationwide investigations showed an association of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with important cardiovascular risk factors11,14 and further supported the findings of preclinical and clinical investigations that demonstrated positive effects of vitamin D and its analogues on fibrinolysis, blood lipids, thrombogenicity, endothelial regeneration, and smooth muscle cell growth.15 Together, these findings strongly suggest that 25-hydroxyvitamin D has beneficial effects, some involving the cardiovascular system, that are independent of calcium metabolism.

The mediator of these effects is thought to be 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, produced by the kidney, by extrarenal tissues (such as the vasculature), and by immune and gastrointestinal cells that express 1α-hydroxylase, which converts 25-hydroxyvitamin D to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D.16 Locally produced 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D may act in an autocrine or a paracrine manner via activation of the vitamin D receptor, which is found in many different cell types throughout the body.16 Because the serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D is roughly 1000-fold higher and the affinity for vitamin D receptor 100-fold lower compared with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, direct effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D on gene transcription or activation by intracellular mitochondrial 1α-hydroxylase may be operative.17 Therefore, low circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D could in theory damage target tissues in the following 2 ways: (1) by low substrate availability for renal and extrarenal 1α-hydroxylase and decreased local intracellular conversion to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and (2) by a diminished direct effect on vitamin D receptor activation.

Apart from intervention studies1820 in hemodialysis patients demonstrating decreased mortality associated with calcitriol treatment, as well as a recent prospective cohort study21 that found an association between mortality and elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels but not between mortality and 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, there are no large longitudinal studies addressing associations of endogenous serum vitamin D levels with overall and cardiovascular mortality. To focus on this research question, we followed up a large cohort of patients referred for coronary angiography who underwent detailed baseline examinations. This allowed us to adjust our analysis for possible confounders of the association between vitamin D levels and mortality.

STUDY POPULATION

The Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study22 is a prospective cohort trial designed to evaluate the effect of genetic polymorphisms and plasma biomarkers on cardiovascular health. Patients were recruited between July 1, 1997, and January 14, 2000, at the Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen (Cardiac Center Ludwigshafen) in southwest Germany (49° 29 minutes north latitude). The rationale and design of this study, baseline characteristics of the population, and definitions used for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and hypertension have been published previously.22 In brief, our study population comprised 3316 patients of white race/ethnicity referred for coronary angiography in a tertiary care medical center. Serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D were determined in 3258 patients (98.3% of the entire study population; mean [SD] age, 62 [10] years), and the analysis was restricted to this group. Study participants had to demonstrate a stable clinical condition except for acute coronary syndrome. Exclusion criteria were any acute illness other than acute coronary syndrome, any predominant noncardiac chronic disease, and a history of malignant neoplasm(s) within the past 5 years. Seventy-eight patients (2.4%) reported taking vitamin supplements on a regular basis, which usually contained B complex vitamins or vitamin D3. Because 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (mean [SD], 22.1 [11.3] ng/mL) were only slightly higher in users of vitamin D preparations compared with the remaining cohort (mean [SD], 17.2 [9.1] ng/mL) and because age, PTH levels, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels did not differ significantly, we decided to include these patients in the present analysis. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant, and the study was approved by the institutional review board at the Ärztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz (Medical Association of Rheinland-Pfalz).

Coronary angiography was commonly indicated because of clinical symptoms or results of noninvasive tests that suggested myocardial ischemia. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined as the presence of at least 50% stenosis of at least 1 of 15 segments of the 3 major coronary arteries, based on maximal luminal narrowing. We used the Charlson Comorbidity Index, which has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument to assess comborbidity,23 to form 3 groups of patients with 0 score points (group 0), 1 score point (group 1), and 2 or more score points (group 2). A questionnaire with a scoring system ranging from 1 to 11 was used to classify the mean physical activity levels, and study participants were grouped into the following 3 categories of physical activity: below average (score, 1-3), average (score, 4-7), and above average (score, ≥8).

LABORATORY ANALYSIS

A fasting venous blood sample was obtained in the morning before coronary angiography. Selected variables were measured after samples were snap frozen and stored at −80°C. A summary of methods and test kits used for variables relevant to this study has been published.22 The estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated according to the 4-variable model of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study.24

Serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D were assayed on a weekly basis using a radioimmunoassay (DiaSorin SA, Antony, France) with intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation of 8.6% and 9.2%, respectively. In a random sample of 100 study participants, 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was also determined using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with isotopic-labeled internal standard and 2 fragment mass to charge ratios of 401.4 to 382.2 (quantifier) and 401.4 to 365.3 (qualifier). Another fragment (mass to charge ratio, 413.5 to 395.4) was used to monitor 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 level, but none could be detected in any of the samples. A highly significant correlation was noted between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels obtained by radioimmunoassay and by LC-MS/MS (r = 0.875, P < .001). Levels of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (Nichols Institute Diagnostika GmbH, Bad Nauheim, Germany) were measured by radioimmunoassay on a multicrystal counter (Berthold LB2014, DiaSorin SA). Intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation were below 10% for all described laboratory procedures.

FOLLOW-UP

Information on mortality was obtained from local registries. We used death certificates to classify the deceased into those who died from cardiovascular vs noncardiovascular causes. This classification was done independently by 2 experienced clinicians who were blinded to any data on the study participants except the already-mentioned information that was required to classify the causes of death. In the event of disagreement or uncertainty concerning the cause of death, the decision was made by one of us who is a principal investigator of the LURIC study (W.M.). Eighteen patients could not be contacted for follow-up, and for 23 of the deceased we had insufficient information to classify the cause of death. The latter study participants were included in the analysis of all-cause mortality but were excluded from any statistical procedure regarding cardiovascular mortality.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Because serum vitamin D levels fluctuate by month throughout the year, we decided for the purpose of this analysis not to use absolute vitamin D levels but instead to categorize individual patients' 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels into quartiles that were obtained on the basis of 202 to 358 vitamin D measurements of study patients each month. To address other possibilities of 25-hydroxyvitamin D categorization and to allow for comparisons with the quartile-based approach already mentioned, these results are also briefly mentioned in the “Comment” section.

Baseline characteristics of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D groups are given as percentages for categorical data and as medians with interquartile ranges for continuous variables. Comparisons between groups were performed using the χ2 test for categorical data and using analysis of variance and analysis of covariance with P for trend and adjustments as indicated for continuous data. If appropriate, continuous variables were logarithmically transformed before use in parametric procedures. Kaplan-Meier curves followed by log-rank test were used to evaluate differences in overall and cardiovascular mortality for 25-hydroxyvitamin D categories. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Hazard ratios for 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D categories were calculated by comparing the data with those of the highest 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D quartiles, respectively. We adjusted for several possible confounders in the Cox proportional hazards regression model by using different models that included important clinical variables, cardiovascular risk factors, or factors related to calcium metabolism. The backward stepwise logistic regression selection method was used, and the results of the final step are given. We tested for plausible interactions between the covariates by adding product terms to our models, and we tested for colinearity. Further assumptions underlying the Cox proportional hazards regression model were evaluated by log minus log survival and partial (Schönfeld) residuals vs survival time plots and were found valid. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and statistical significance was defined as P < .05. All data were analyzed using commercially available statistical software (SPSS 15.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois).

MORTALITY RATES

After a median follow-up of 7.7 years, 737 persons (22.6% of the study population at baseline) had died. Of these, 463 deaths (62.8%) were from cardiovascular causes, 251 (34.1%) were from noncardiovascular causes, and 23 (3.1%) could not be classified because of insufficient data about the cause of death. Among patients with angiographic CAD, 319 deaths occurred from cardiovascular causes and 148 deaths from noncardiovascular causes.

25-HYDROXYVITAMIN D LEVELS

Significant seasonal changes in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were found, with the lowest and highest levels appearing in March (mean [SD], 12.0 [6.8] ng/mL) and in August (mean [SD], 22.7 [9.6] ng/mL) (P < .001, analysis of variance), corresponding to an 89% difference in the mean levels. When patients were grouped into different 25-hydroxyvitamin D categories (0-10, >10-20, >20-25, >25-30, and >30 ng/mL), PTH levels began to rise significantly with the category of greater than 20 to 25 ng/mL. Respective increases in PTH levels averaged 3 pg/mL (to convert PTH levels to nanograms per liter, multiply by 1.0) (for the >20-25 ng/mL category), 5 pg/mL (for the >10-20 ng/mL category), and 12 pg/mL (for the 0-10 ng/mL category). Because 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels vary with the month of the year, the range of 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles fluctuates as well (Figure 1).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Monthly 25-hydroxyvitamin D level changes in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles. Black bars indicate 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile 1 (lowest levels); light gray bars, quartile 4 (highest levels). To convert 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 2.496.

Graphic Jump Location
BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS

Baseline characteristics according to 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles are summarized in Table 1. On average, patients in the lowest 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile were older, were more likely to be female, and had more comorbidities. The mean serum PTH levels were 36% higher and the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels 31% lower among patients in the lowest 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile compared with those in the highest quartile. Differences in corrected serum calcium and phosphate levels were absent or small.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Baseline Characteristics According to 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Quartiles
SURVIVAL STATISTICS

Kaplan-Meier curve analysis followed by log-rank test showed that risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality increases significantly (P < .001) across 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles (Figure 2). Hazard ratios (with 95% CIs) for all-cause mortality (Table 2) and for cardiovascular mortality (Figure 3) among 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D quartiles are given for 3 different statistical models that include traditional cardiovascular risk factors or other variables directly or indirectly correlated with vitamin D metabolism. After adjustment for the respective other serum vitamin D level, 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D associations with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality remained significant.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier plots of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles (Q). Log-rank test indicated a significant difference across all 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles (P < .001). Multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios for patients in the lower two 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles (median, 7.6 and 13.3 ng/mL) were higher for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-2.70; and hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.01; respectively) and for cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.13; and hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.58; respectively) compared with patients in the highest 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile (median, 28.4 ng/mL). To convert 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 2.496.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Cox proportional hazards regression model ratios (including 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for cardiovascular mortality are shown for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (A) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (B) quartiles (Q) for the following 3 different statistical models (M): (1) M1 (unadjusted), (2) M2 (adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and physical activity level), and (3) M3 (variables of M2 plus active smokers, diabetes mellitus, albumin level, cystatin C level, triglyceride level, N-terminal pro-BNP level, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and the use of statins, aspirin, β-blockers, bronchodilators, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors).

Graphic Jump Location
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Hazard Ratios (HR) for All-Cause Mortality According to 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D Quartiles
SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

We performed a multivariate-adjusted subgroup analysis (based on covariates of model 3, described in the legend to Figure 3) for all-cause mortality among patients in different Charlson Comorbidity Index, New York Heart Association functional class, and physical activity level categories. These results are shown in Figure 4.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Multivariate-adjusted (covariates as in model 3 of Figure 3) hazard ratios for all-cause mortality in patients categorized by Charlson Comorbidity Index (A), New York Heart Association functional class (B), and physical activity level (C). Q1 indicates patients in the lowest 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile; Q4, patients in the highest 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile. *P < .05. †P < .01. ‡P < .005. §P < .001 compared with the reference group.

Graphic Jump Location
CORRELATION OF 25-HYDROXYVITAMIN D LEVELS WITH 1,25-DIHYDROXYVITAMIN D LEVELS

Univariate correlation analysis between 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels was weak (r = 0.36, P < .001) even after adjustment for cystatin C levels (r = 0.32, P < .001). Patients in a given 25-hydroxyvitamin D category could have 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D serum levels ranging from low to high (Figure 5A). Patients' concurrent assignment to both vitamin D quartiles suggests a synergistic increase in all-cause mortality within a respective 25-hydroxyvitamin D or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D quartile with declining levels of the respective other vitamin D level (Figure 5B).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Univariate correlation analysis. A, Distribution profile for both serum vitamin D levels among patients assigned to different 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D quartiles. Although patients with concomitantly high (column H) or concomitantly low (column L) levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D were frequent, the overall correlation between the 2 endogenous D vitamins was weak (r = 0.32, P < .001). B, Effects on mortality rates when 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels were considered concomitantly. Patients of column H (both high) showed the lowest and those of column L (both low) the highest mortality rates during the study period.

Graphic Jump Location
MORTALITY RISK IN PATIENTS WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT CAD

We split the results of multivariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models by different categories of angiographic CAD. A total of 2190 patients (67.3%) had significant CAD (≥50% stenosis). Six hundred ninety-three patients had virtually no CAD (<20% stenosis). Even in patients with CAD of less than 50% stenosis or less than 20% stenosis, there was a gradual increase in all-cause mortality for all lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D quartiles (Figure 6).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 6.

The 25-hydroxyvitamin D (A) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (B) patient quartiles and corresponding effects on multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (covariates as in model 3 of Figure 3) for all-cause mortality according to patients' coronary artery disease (CAD) status as determined by coronary angiography at baseline. CAD ≥ 50% indicates patients with significant CAD; patients without significant CAD are presented as 2 categories (<50% or by the most stringent criteria of <20% narrowing of ≥1 of 15 coronary artery segments evaluated). * P < .05. †P < .01. ‡P < .005. §P < .001 compared with the reference group.

Graphic Jump Location
CARDIOVASCULAR RISK MARKERS

We performed multivariate-adjusted comparisons among 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles for biological markers potentially linked to cardiovascular risk (Table 3). In addition, multiple linear regression analyses were performed for 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels, which were found to be correlated with the following log values (significant for all 25-hydroxyvitamin D correlations and for most 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D correlations): glutathione, interleukin 6, phospholipids, C-reactive protein, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, with standard β coefficients of 0.10 to 0.20 (P < .001 for all) after adjustments for age, sex, body mass index, and physical activity level and of 0.05 to 0.10 after additional multivariate adjustments. The direction of these correlations pointed toward an increase in cardiovascular risk at low vitamin D levels. Variables available for all patients (C-reactive protein and phospholipid levels) were also added to multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models and were found not to significantly affect the vitamin D mortality relationship.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 3. Associations of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Quartiles With Cardiovascular Risk Markersa

This study demonstrates that 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels that are in the lower 50% of the vitamin D range of our study population have a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.53 to 2.08 for all-cause mortality after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In subgroup analysis, the relationship of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to mortality was consistent regardless of comorbidity, physical activity level, or New York Heart Association functional class. We could also exclude that variables known to be vitamin D dependent such as serum PTH, calcium, or phosphate level were driving confounders in the association between mortality and serum vitamin D levels. Therefore, a low 25-hydroxyvitamin D level can be considered a strong risk indicator for all-cause mortality in women and in men.

For this analysis, a retrospective classification of all individual 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels into quartiles was performed on the basis of 202 to 358 measurements of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels each month. A patient belonging to the lowest monthly quartile could have 25-hydroxyvitamin D values ranging from 1.9 to 15.3 ng/mL depending on the season of the year. Although in theory such an approach of quartile-based monthly cutoffs seems logical and appealing, we reached similar results when absolute serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were considered.

However, the cutoff discriminating vitamin D insufficiency and sufficiency is still a matter of debate, and there is likely a “gray area” of overlap between these 2 entities. A cutoff value of 20 ng/mL for normal 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels may be considered a more conservative threshold value because vitamin D levels below that have clearly been shown to be associated with increases in serum PTH levels,25 decreases in physical performance,26 and diminished lower extremity function.27 Using such a vitamin D classification, we calculated multivariate-adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality of 2.13 (95% CI, 1.70-2.68) for patients with vitamin D deficiency (≤10 ng/mL) and 1.33 (95% CI, 1.07-1.65) for patients with vitamin D insufficiency (>10-20 ng/mL), values that are close to the HRs obtained using the quartile-based approach. If vitamin D deficiency is defined as 20 ng/mL or less and vitamin D insufficiency as greater than 20 to 30 ng/mL or less and is compared with values greater than 30 ng/mL, the adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality were 2.34 (95% CI, 1.48-3.39) for patients with vitamin D deficiency and 1.54 (95% CI, 0.99-2.41) for patients with vitamin D insufficiency. Using yet another approach, we expressed 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels as percentiles within the respective month. Here, the adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality among patients having hydroxyvitamin D values in the lowest 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile became even higher compared with those among patients having 25-hydroxyvitamin D values above the 10th percentile (adjusted HR, 4.91; 95% CI, 3.33-7.20; and adjusted HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.95-4.75). Therefore, it cannot be excluded that risk gradients become even steeper when outcomes are compared with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels well above those seen in our study population.

At first glance, the percentage of patients with low 25-hydroxyvitamin D values seems unexpectedly high in the present study. Roughly two-thirds had serum levels below 20 ng/mL. However, our mean value of 17.3 ng/mL compares well with values reported from other large trials performed in middle European countries such as France, Italy, and Germany.2830

Another important aspect supporting our conclusions is that, similar to low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, low 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels were associated with increased HRs for mortality, despite a weak correlation between the 2 (r = 0.36). This leads to the conclusion that 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels may yield similar but independent biologic effects. This is also in line with our finding that, when both variables are considered concomitantly, a synergistic effect on mortality risk seems evident (Figure 5B).

What are the major determinants of circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels? By multiple regression analysis with relevant variables included and with serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D level set as the dependent variable, 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (partial R2 = 9.6%) and renal function (partial R2 = 7.3% for log cystatin C) constituted the 2 most important independent predictors in the model, yielding an overall R2 of 24%. We were unable to find an independent association with age, despite a study31 demonstrating such an effect on 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D production after infusion of PTH fragment 1-34. Consequently, availability of 25-hydroxyvitamin D substrate and renal function account for a small explainable proportion of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D serum levels. The question remains whether extrarenal production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D contributes, at least in part, to the circulating pool of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in individuals with normal renal function.

Another interesting aspect of the present study is that the association of vitamin D levels with mortality can be compared between patients with and without CAD. Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels were associated with significant increases in all-cause mortality but were consistently higher in patients without significant CAD. We conclude from these data that low 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels seem to be important mediators of mortality even when there is little or no indication of overt vascular disease.

A limitation of our study is that we are unable to decide whether the association between low 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels and mortality is causal or not. However, there are a few indications pointing to a possible link. Elevated C-reactive protein and interleukin 6 levels in patients with lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels suggests that 25-hydroxyvitamin D has anti-inflammatory properties. Similar relationships have been reported by others.32,33 Together with the effects related to oxidative stress and increased cell adhesion that we found, low levels of vitamin D may detrimentally affect vascular biologic function in multiple ways. Other mechanisms whereby low vitamin D levels may be associated with mortality include effects on matrix metalloproteinases,32,34 which were shown to affect plaque production and stability, increased susceptibility to arterial calcification,35,36 or an increase in renin messenger RNA expression.37

Further limitations of our study are related to 25-hydroxyvitamin D level determination and possibly race/ethnicity and changes of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels over time. For measurements of 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum levels, we used a commercial radioimmunoassay that was validated against an LC-MS/MS as a reference method in a patient subgroup. The correlation between the 2 methods was strong (r = 0.87). We have further confidence in our vitamin D measurements because the annual variation in 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and the rise in serum PTH levels in patients with vitamin D insufficiency were similar, as expected,25 and because there was a graded biological effect with decreasing 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in a given individual seem to be constant over time. Among 100 healthy older individuals participating in a fall prevention study performed at 2 centers, we found a high correlation between two 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels that were 12 months apart (r = 0.758, P < .001; H.D., unpublished data, 2004), suggesting low intraindividual variation over time. The results of this study may further apply only to white race/ethnicity; despite low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in African Americans, little or no correlation to cardiovascular disease was reported.11

In conclusion, this prospective cohort study demonstrates for the first time, to our knowledge, that low 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with increased risk in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared with patients with higher serum vitamin D levels. Both vitamins seem to have synergistic biologic action that is largely independent of each other. Apart from the proved effects that vitamin D has on bone metabolism and neuromuscular function, appropriate serum levels (that may also be higher than in the present investigation) are associated with a decrease in mortality. Although not proved, it seems possible that at least part of this effect may be due to lowering of a risk profile promoting atherosclerosis and preventing cardiovascular end points. Based on the findings of this study, a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of 20 ng/mL or higher may be advised for maintaining general health.

Correspondence: Harald Dobnig, MD, Division of Endocrinology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, A-8036 Graz, Austria (harald.dobnig@meduni-graz.at).

Accepted for Publication: January 27, 2008.

Author Contributions: Dr Dobnig had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Boehm and Maerz. Acquisition of data: Scharnagl, Renner, Seelhorst, Wellnitz, Kinkeldei, Boehm, Weihrauch, and Maerz. Analysis and interpretation of the data: Dobnig, Pilz, Renner, and Maerz. Drafting of the manuscript: Dobnig, Pilz, and Maerz. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Scharnagl, Renner, Seelhorst, Wellnitz, Kinkeldei, Boehm, and Weihrauch. Statistical analysis: Dobnig and Pilz. Obtained funding: Boehm and Maerz. Administrative, technical, or material support: Scharnagl, Renner, Seelhorst, Wellnitz, Kinkeldei, and Weihrauch. Study supervision: Maerz.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: The LURIC study has received unrestricted grants from Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, Dade Behring, and AstraZeneca.

Additional Contributions: The German registration offices and local public health departments assisted with the study. Eugenia Lamont and Günter J. Krejs, MD, critically reviewed the manuscript, and Andrea Groselj-Strele, MSc, provided statistical advice. We thank the participants of the LURIC study, the LURIC study team, and the laboratory staff at the Ludwigshafen General Hospital, the University of Freiburg, and the University of Ulm.

Vieth  RBischoff-Ferrari  HBoucher  BJ  et al.  The urgent need to recommend an intake of vitamin D that is effective [published correction appears in Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(3):809]. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85 (3) 649- 650
PubMed
Holick  MF Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 2007;357 (3) 266- 281
PubMed
Norman  AWBouillon  RWhiting  SJVieth  RLips  P 13th Workshop Consensus for Vitamin D Nutritional Guidelines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007;103 (3-5) 204- 205
PubMed
Bischoff-Ferrari  HAGiovannucci  EWillett  WCDietrich  TDawson-Hughes  B Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes [published corrections appear in Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(5):1253 and 2007;86(3):809]. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84 (1) 18- 28
PubMed
Bischoff-Ferrari  HAZhang  YKiel  DPFelson  DT Positive association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and bone density in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005;53 (6) 821- 826
PubMed
Bischoff-Ferrari  HADawson-Hughes  BWillett  WC  et al.  Effect of vitamin D on falls: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;291 (16) 1999- 2006
PubMed
Bischoff-Ferrari  HAWillett  WCWong  JBGiovannucci  EDietrich  TDawson-Hughes  B Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2005;293 (18) 2257- 2264
PubMed
Garland  CFGarland  FCGorham  ED  et al.  The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention. Am J Public Health 2006;96 (2) 252- 261
PubMed
Liu  PTStenger  SLi  H  et al.  Toll-like receptor triggering of a vitamin D–mediated human antimicrobial response. Science 2006;311 (5768) 1770- 1773
PubMed
Zittermann  A Vitamin D and disease prevention with special reference to cardiovascular disease. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2006;92 (1) 39- 48
PubMed
Martins  DWolf  MPan  D  et al.  Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and the serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the United States: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med 2007;167 (11) 1159- 1165
PubMed
Forman  JPGiovannucci  EHolmes  MD  et al.  Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of incident hypertension. Hypertension 2007;49 (5) 1063- 1069
PubMed
Chiu  KCChu  AGo  VLSaad  MF Hypovitaminosis D is associated with insulin resistance and β cell dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79 (5) 820- 825
PubMed
Chonchol  MScragg  R 25-Hydroxyvitamin D, insulin resistance, and kidney function in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Kidney Int 2007;71 (2) 134- 139
PubMed
Wu-Wong  JRNakane  MMa  JRuan  XKroeger  PE Effects of vitamin D analogs on gene expression profiling in human coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis 2006;186 (1) 20- 28
PubMed
Hewison  MBurke  FEvans  KN  et al.  Extra-renal 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1α-hydroxylase in human health and disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007;103 (3-5) 316- 321
PubMed
Dusso  ASBrown  AJSlatopolsky  E Vitamin D. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2005;289 (1) F8- F28
PubMed
Teng  MWolf  MLowrie  EOfsthun  NLazarus  JMThadhani  R Survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis with paricalcitol or calcitriol therapy. N Engl J Med 2003;349 (5) 446- 456
PubMed
Tentori  FHunt  WCStidley  CA  et al.  Mortality risk among hemodialysis patients receiving different vitamin D analogs. Kidney Int 2006;70 (10) 1858- 1865
PubMed
Wolf  MShah  AGutierrez  O  et al.  Vitamin D levels and early mortality among incident hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2007;72 (8) 1004- 1013
PubMed
Sambrook  PNChen  JSMarch  LM  et al.  Serum parathyroid hormone is associated with increased mortality independent of 25-hydroxy vitamin D status, bone mass, and renal function in the frail and very old: a cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89 (11) 5477- 5481
PubMed
Winkelmann  BRMärz  WBoehm  BO  et al. LURIC Study Group (Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health), Rationale and design of the LURIC study: a resource for functional genomics, pharmacogenomics and long-term prognosis of cardiovascular disease. Pharmacogenomics 2001;2 (1) ((suppl 1)) S1- S73
PubMed
de Groot  VBeckerman  HLankhorst  GJBouter  LM How to measure comorbidity: a critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56 (3) 221- 229
PubMed
National Kidney Foundation, K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39 (2) ((suppl 1)) S1- S266
PubMed
Lips  P Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev 2001;22 (4) 477- 501
PubMed
Wicherts  ISvan Schoor  NMBoeke  AJ  et al.  Vitamin D status predicts physical performance and its decline in older persons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92 (6) 2058- 2065
PubMed
Bischoff-Ferrari  HADietrich  TOrav  EJ  et al.  Higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with better lower-extremity function in both active and inactive persons aged ≥60 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80 (3) 752- 758
PubMed
Chapuy  MCSchott  AMGarnero  PHans  DDelmas  PDMeunier  PJEpidemiology of Osteoporosis (EPIDOS) Study Group, Healthy elderly French women living at home have secondary hyperparathyroidism and high bone turnover in winter. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81 (3) 1129- 1133
PubMed
Bettica  PBevilacqua  MVago  TNorbiato  G High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D among free-living postmenopausal women referred to an osteoporosis outpatient clinic in northern Italy for initial screening. Osteoporos Int 1999;9 (3) 226- 229
PubMed
Woitge  HWScheidt-Nave  CKissling  C  et al.  Seasonal variation of biochemical indexes of bone turnover: results of a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83 (1) 68- 75
PubMed
Slovik  DMAdams  JSNeer  RMHolick  MFPotts  JT  Jr Deficient production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in elderly osteoporotic patients. N Engl J Med 1981;305 (7) 372- 374
PubMed
Timms  PMMannan  NHitman  GA  et al.  Circulating MMP9, vitamin D and variation in the TIMP-1 response with VDR genotype: mechanisms for inflammatory damage in chronic disorders? QJM 2002;95 (12) 787- 796
PubMed
Van den Berghe  GVan Roosbroeck  DVanhove  PWouters  PJDe Pourcq  LBouillon  R Bone turnover in prolonged critical illness: effect of vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88 (10) 4623- 4632
PubMed
Rahman  AHershey  SAhmed  SNibbelink  KSimpson  RU Heart extracellular matrix gene expression profile in the vitamin D receptor knockout mice. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007;103 (3-5) 416- 419
PubMed
Giachelli  CMJono  SShioi  ANishizawa  YMori  KMorii  H Vascular calcification and inorganic phosphate. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;38 (4) ((suppl 1)) S34- S37
PubMed
Watson  KEAbrolat  MLMalone  LL  et al.  Active serum vitamin D levels are inversely correlated with coronary calcification. Circulation 1997;96 (6) 1755- 1760
PubMed
Xiang  WKong  JChen  S  et al.  Cardiac hypertrophy in vitamin D receptor knockout mice: role of the systemic and cardiac renin-angiotensin systems. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005;288 (1) e125- e132http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367398?ordinalpos=6&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.PubMed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum. Accessed May 8, 2008
PubMed

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Monthly 25-hydroxyvitamin D level changes in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles. Black bars indicate 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile 1 (lowest levels); light gray bars, quartile 4 (highest levels). To convert 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 2.496.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier plots of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles (Q). Log-rank test indicated a significant difference across all 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles (P < .001). Multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios for patients in the lower two 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartiles (median, 7.6 and 13.3 ng/mL) were higher for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-2.70; and hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.01; respectively) and for cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.13; and hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.58; respectively) compared with patients in the highest 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile (median, 28.4 ng/mL). To convert 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 2.496.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Cox proportional hazards regression model ratios (including 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for cardiovascular mortality are shown for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (A) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (B) quartiles (Q) for the following 3 different statistical models (M): (1) M1 (unadjusted), (2) M2 (adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and physical activity level), and (3) M3 (variables of M2 plus active smokers, diabetes mellitus, albumin level, cystatin C level, triglyceride level, N-terminal pro-BNP level, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and the use of statins, aspirin, β-blockers, bronchodilators, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Multivariate-adjusted (covariates as in model 3 of Figure 3) hazard ratios for all-cause mortality in patients categorized by Charlson Comorbidity Index (A), New York Heart Association functional class (B), and physical activity level (C). Q1 indicates patients in the lowest 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile; Q4, patients in the highest 25-hydroxyvitamin D quartile. *P < .05. †P < .01. ‡P < .005. §P < .001 compared with the reference group.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Univariate correlation analysis. A, Distribution profile for both serum vitamin D levels among patients assigned to different 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D quartiles. Although patients with concomitantly high (column H) or concomitantly low (column L) levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D were frequent, the overall correlation between the 2 endogenous D vitamins was weak (r = 0.32, P < .001). B, Effects on mortality rates when 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels were considered concomitantly. Patients of column H (both high) showed the lowest and those of column L (both low) the highest mortality rates during the study period.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 6.

The 25-hydroxyvitamin D (A) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (B) patient quartiles and corresponding effects on multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (covariates as in model 3 of Figure 3) for all-cause mortality according to patients' coronary artery disease (CAD) status as determined by coronary angiography at baseline. CAD ≥ 50% indicates patients with significant CAD; patients without significant CAD are presented as 2 categories (<50% or by the most stringent criteria of <20% narrowing of ≥1 of 15 coronary artery segments evaluated). * P < .05. †P < .01. ‡P < .005. §P < .001 compared with the reference group.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Baseline Characteristics According to 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Quartiles
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Hazard Ratios (HR) for All-Cause Mortality According to 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D Quartiles
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 3. Associations of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Quartiles With Cardiovascular Risk Markersa

References

Vieth  RBischoff-Ferrari  HBoucher  BJ  et al.  The urgent need to recommend an intake of vitamin D that is effective [published correction appears in Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(3):809]. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85 (3) 649- 650
PubMed
Holick  MF Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 2007;357 (3) 266- 281
PubMed
Norman  AWBouillon  RWhiting  SJVieth  RLips  P 13th Workshop Consensus for Vitamin D Nutritional Guidelines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007;103 (3-5) 204- 205
PubMed
Bischoff-Ferrari  HAGiovannucci  EWillett  WCDietrich  TDawson-Hughes  B Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes [published corrections appear in Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(5):1253 and 2007;86(3):809]. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84 (1) 18- 28
PubMed
Bischoff-Ferrari  HAZhang  YKiel  DPFelson  DT Positive association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and bone density in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005;53 (6) 821- 826
PubMed
Bischoff-Ferrari  HADawson-Hughes  BWillett  WC  et al.  Effect of vitamin D on falls: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;291 (16) 1999- 2006
PubMed
Bischoff-Ferrari  HAWillett  WCWong  JBGiovannucci  EDietrich  TDawson-Hughes  B Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2005;293 (18) 2257- 2264
PubMed
Garland  CFGarland  FCGorham  ED  et al.  The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention. Am J Public Health 2006;96 (2) 252- 261
PubMed
Liu  PTStenger  SLi  H  et al.  Toll-like receptor triggering of a vitamin D–mediated human antimicrobial response. Science 2006;311 (5768) 1770- 1773
PubMed
Zittermann  A Vitamin D and disease prevention with special reference to cardiovascular disease. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2006;92 (1) 39- 48
PubMed
Martins  DWolf  MPan  D  et al.  Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and the serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the United States: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med 2007;167 (11) 1159- 1165
PubMed
Forman  JPGiovannucci  EHolmes  MD  et al.  Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of incident hypertension. Hypertension 2007;49 (5) 1063- 1069
PubMed
Chiu  KCChu  AGo  VLSaad  MF Hypovitaminosis D is associated with insulin resistance and β cell dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79 (5) 820- 825
PubMed
Chonchol  MScragg  R 25-Hydroxyvitamin D, insulin resistance, and kidney function in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Kidney Int 2007;71 (2) 134- 139
PubMed
Wu-Wong  JRNakane  MMa  JRuan  XKroeger  PE Effects of vitamin D analogs on gene expression profiling in human coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis 2006;186 (1) 20- 28
PubMed
Hewison  MBurke  FEvans  KN  et al.  Extra-renal 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1α-hydroxylase in human health and disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007;103 (3-5) 316- 321
PubMed
Dusso  ASBrown  AJSlatopolsky  E Vitamin D. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2005;289 (1) F8- F28
PubMed
Teng  MWolf  MLowrie  EOfsthun  NLazarus  JMThadhani  R Survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis with paricalcitol or calcitriol therapy. N Engl J Med 2003;349 (5) 446- 456
PubMed
Tentori  FHunt  WCStidley  CA  et al.  Mortality risk among hemodialysis patients receiving different vitamin D analogs. Kidney Int 2006;70 (10) 1858- 1865
PubMed
Wolf  MShah  AGutierrez  O  et al.  Vitamin D levels and early mortality among incident hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2007;72 (8) 1004- 1013
PubMed
Sambrook  PNChen  JSMarch  LM  et al.  Serum parathyroid hormone is associated with increased mortality independent of 25-hydroxy vitamin D status, bone mass, and renal function in the frail and very old: a cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89 (11) 5477- 5481
PubMed
Winkelmann  BRMärz  WBoehm  BO  et al. LURIC Study Group (Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health), Rationale and design of the LURIC study: a resource for functional genomics, pharmacogenomics and long-term prognosis of cardiovascular disease. Pharmacogenomics 2001;2 (1) ((suppl 1)) S1- S73
PubMed
de Groot  VBeckerman  HLankhorst  GJBouter  LM How to measure comorbidity: a critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56 (3) 221- 229
PubMed
National Kidney Foundation, K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39 (2) ((suppl 1)) S1- S266
PubMed
Lips  P Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev 2001;22 (4) 477- 501
PubMed
Wicherts  ISvan Schoor  NMBoeke  AJ  et al.  Vitamin D status predicts physical performance and its decline in older persons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92 (6) 2058- 2065
PubMed
Bischoff-Ferrari  HADietrich  TOrav  EJ  et al.  Higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with better lower-extremity function in both active and inactive persons aged ≥60 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80 (3) 752- 758
PubMed
Chapuy  MCSchott  AMGarnero  PHans  DDelmas  PDMeunier  PJEpidemiology of Osteoporosis (EPIDOS) Study Group, Healthy elderly French women living at home have secondary hyperparathyroidism and high bone turnover in winter. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81 (3) 1129- 1133
PubMed
Bettica  PBevilacqua  MVago  TNorbiato  G High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D among free-living postmenopausal women referred to an osteoporosis outpatient clinic in northern Italy for initial screening. Osteoporos Int 1999;9 (3) 226- 229
PubMed
Woitge  HWScheidt-Nave  CKissling  C  et al.  Seasonal variation of biochemical indexes of bone turnover: results of a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83 (1) 68- 75
PubMed
Slovik  DMAdams  JSNeer  RMHolick  MFPotts  JT  Jr Deficient production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in elderly osteoporotic patients. N Engl J Med 1981;305 (7) 372- 374
PubMed
Timms  PMMannan  NHitman  GA  et al.  Circulating MMP9, vitamin D and variation in the TIMP-1 response with VDR genotype: mechanisms for inflammatory damage in chronic disorders? QJM 2002;95 (12) 787- 796
PubMed
Van den Berghe  GVan Roosbroeck  DVanhove  PWouters  PJDe Pourcq  LBouillon  R Bone turnover in prolonged critical illness: effect of vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88 (10) 4623- 4632
PubMed
Rahman  AHershey  SAhmed  SNibbelink  KSimpson  RU Heart extracellular matrix gene expression profile in the vitamin D receptor knockout mice. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007;103 (3-5) 416- 419
PubMed
Giachelli  CMJono  SShioi  ANishizawa  YMori  KMorii  H Vascular calcification and inorganic phosphate. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;38 (4) ((suppl 1)) S34- S37
PubMed
Watson  KEAbrolat  MLMalone  LL  et al.  Active serum vitamin D levels are inversely correlated with coronary calcification. Circulation 1997;96 (6) 1755- 1760
PubMed
Xiang  WKong  JChen  S  et al.  Cardiac hypertrophy in vitamin D receptor knockout mice: role of the systemic and cardiac renin-angiotensin systems. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005;288 (1) e125- e132http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367398?ordinalpos=6&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.PubMed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum. Accessed May 8, 2008
PubMed

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 489

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles