This article was corrected | View correction
In recent years, numerous new biomarkers have been proposed for risk stratification in coronary heart disease (CHD), as opportunistic researchers have capitalized on stored blood samples from large clinical trials and registries to perform rapid and relatively inexpensive biomarker screening. A number of biomarkers reflecting distinct pathophysiological processes, including C-reactive protein (CRP), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and markers of renal function such as creatinine clearance (CrCl) and cystatin C, have been shown to provide independent prognostic value to traditional risk predictors in multivariable analyses. While the demonstrations of such associations are necessary first steps, they do not establish the full clinical utility of a biomarker, which is a more demanding process that requires validation in multiple cohorts, a reliable and cost-effective assay, and clear demonstration of incremental prognostic value over traditional risk models. An important but often overlooked consideration is that the biomarker must offer tangible value to the end users (the clinician and the patient) in order to be widely adopted. This is best accomplished by either improving diagnostic performance or providing therapeutic guidance. It is also possible that more accurate risk stratification may help to convince patients to comply with lifestyle recommendations and preventive therapies, although this has yet to be proven. Examples of biomarkers that have been widely adopted and largely meet the needs of clinicians and their patients include troponin testing for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement to guide lipid management.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 6
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.