0
Editor's Correspondence |

Ten Points for a National Health Plan

J. Gary Grant, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(22):2631. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In their article on national health insurance, Woolhandler and Himmelstein1 are right for a number of reasons:

  • The current nonsystem takes a tremendous amount of resources away from health care.

  • The current nonsystem is redundant and frustrating for all involved (except insurance company executives who make unconscionable millions of dollars each year).

  • Currently, the insurance industry rules supreme—along with Wall Street.

  • The pharmaceutical industry is next in power; then come the politicians, influenced and lobbied aggressively by the powers above. So much is consumed by these "market forces."

  • Whatever is left over goes to patients and providers—and it is not enough!

  • Medicare works; it's pretty fair and efficient but could use some improvements.

  • United States military and Department of Veterans Affairs health care also work fairly well as examples of "socialized medicine."

  • We can do better than Canada, but we must set some limits like Oregon had the guts to do.

  • It seems that the Republican party is in bed with Wall Street and the insurance industry, both of which will fight a national health plan tooth and nail.

  • The American Medical Association (AMA) should champion real health care reform, but I fear the AMA is too stodgy.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

December 9, 2002
David U. Himmelstein, MD; Steffie Woolhandler, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(22):2632. doi:.
CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();