We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

A Low-Dose Perspective on the Calcium Antagonist Controversy

Robert L. Bloomfield; Henry S. Miller; Carolyn F. Pedley; Michael J. Colflesh; Sergei Novikov
Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(10):1115-1116. doi:10.1001/archinte.1996.00040041115017.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We read, with great interest, the articles and the editorial in your November 13, 1995, issue of the Archives.1-3 Like so many in your readership, we use a large volume of calcium antagonists in the treatment of our hypertensive patients, particularly those with arrhythmias and angina. We have also listened to Furberg and Psaty3 at various meetings. One issue that all the authors1-3 should have addressed in more detail in their articles relates to the dose-response differences of these agents. The Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study4 is alluded to by Epstein2 in regard to comparisons of different antihypertensive agents. However, as the Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study demonstrated, low doses of various classes of pharmacologic agents, as opposed to higher doses, may have differing physiologic effects. Furberg,5 himself, has stated that dose-response differences represent one issue that directed him to the potential problems associated with


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.