We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Diabetes Is Not Associated With Longer Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer

Hiroaki Satoh, MD; Hiroichi Ishikawa, MD; Koichi Kurishima, MD; Morio Ohtsuka, MD; Kiyohisa Sekizawa, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(3):485. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We read with interest the letter by De Giorgio and associates1 on cancer with or without diabetes mellitus (DM), published in the ARCHIVES. Among 974 patients with lung cancer admitted to our division during a 25-year period, 90 patients were diagnosed as having DM. Using the generalized Wilcoxon test, a statistically significant difference in survival was not observed between patients with DM and patients without DM (P = .24). In multivariate regression analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model,2 sex (P<.001), stage (P<.001), and performance status (P<.001) were significantly related to survival; however, coexisting DM was not a significant prognostic factor for survival (P = .94). Therefore, we disagree with the conclusion by De Giorgio and associates that "diabetes is associated with longer survival rates in patients with malignant tumors," including lung cancer. We would appreciate hearing about the diagnostic criteria of DM in patients with lung cancer. We believe that multivariate regression analysis is one of the suitable methods for determining the prognostic factor. We also question the best statistical method for determination of the prognostic factor.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Diabetes, Foot Ulcer

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy