We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Prevention of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug—Induced Gastrointestinal Mucosal Injury A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

Maurizio Koch, MD; Angelo Dezi, MD; Fabio Ferrario, MD; Lucio Capurso, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(20):2321-2332. doi:10.1001/archinte.1996.00440190069008.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Background:  The policy of prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)—induced gastrointestinal mucosal injury is still a matter of discussion. Indeed, no consensus exists as to whether cotherapy with histamine type 2 (H2) blockers or misoprostol is cost-effective.

Methods:  Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials on the use of H2 blockers or misoprostol, as preventive agents (published between January 1970 and December 1994), were identified through MEDLINE and reference lists from literature reviews. Crude rates of endoscopic lesions with short-term (<2 weeks) and long-term (>4 weeks) NSAID treatment were systematically assessed by 3 independent observers based on the intention-to-treat principle. The method of DerSimonian and Laird was used for pooling data. Heterogeneity was evaluated by using the Q statistic and the plots described by L'Abbé and colleagues.

Results:  Twenty-four trials met the criteria for entry into the study. Gastric ulcer was found to be significantly reduced by misoprostol—both in short-term (pooled rate difference [RD], —13%; 95% confidence interval [CI], —26% to —1%) and long-term (RD, —8%; 95% CI, —18% to —1%) NSAID treatment—but not by H2 blockers. The risk for duodenal ulcer was significantly reduced by H2 blockers (RD, —2%; 95% CI, —5% to —0.2%) and by misoprostol (RD, —3%; 95% CI, —6% to —0.1%) in long-term but not in short-term administration.

Conclusions:  The use of misoprostol, but not that of H2 blockers, was beneficial in the prevention of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers. The number of patients to be treated to prevent 1 gastric ulcer with short- and long-term NSAID treatment is 11 and 15, respectively, for an intermediate baseline risk of 10%. Misoprostol and H2 blockers were beneficial in the long-term prevention of duodenal ulcers; misoprostol or H2 blockers in the short-term prevention of duodenal ulcers remains to be confirmed.Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2321-2332


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

82 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.