Value of Tongue Biting in the Diagnosis of Seizures

Selim R. Benbadis, MD; Barbara R. Wolgamuth, REEGT; Hershel Goren, MD; Sorin Brener, MD; Fetnat Fouad-Tarazi, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(21):2346-2349. doi:10.1001/archinte.1995.00430210096015.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background:  Seizures are rarely witnessed by physicians, and the diagnosis is usually made on the basis of the history. Tongue biting is classically considered to favor a diagnosis of epileptic seizure. The usefulness of tongue biting in the differential diagnosis of seizures was evaluated.

Methods:  A prospective study of the presence of oral lacerations in 106 consecutive patients admitted to our Epilepsy Monitoring Unit and a retrospective study of a population of 45 patients with syncope were performed. The relationship between tongue biting and diagnosis (epileptic vs nonepileptic events) was analyzed.

Results:  Of the 106 monitored patients, 63 had episodes characterized by bilateral motor activity, complete loss of consciousness, or both; 34 patients had epileptic seizures, while 29 patients had exclusively nonepileptic episodes. Eight patients suffered an oral laceration; all involved the side of the tongue, and all had documented epileptic seizures. Of the 45 patients with syncope, in only one was the tongue lacerated, and this was at the tip. Tongue biting had a sensitivity of 24% and a specificity of 99% for the diagnosis of generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Lateral tongue biting was 100% specific to grand mal seizures.

Conclusion:  Tongue biting, particularly if it is lateral, is highly specific to generalized tonic-clonic seizures.(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:2346-2349)


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 47

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.