Long-term Patient Self-management of Oral Anticoagulation

Jack E. Ansell, MD; Neal Patel; Daniel Ostrovsky; Elaine Nozzolillo, BSN; Ann Marie Peterson, MSN; Lynn Fish
Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(20):2185-2189. doi:10.1001/archinte.1995.00430200066010.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background:  The management of oral anticoagulation is fraught with difficulties. This study assessed a new model of anticoagulation management regarding the ability, safety, and efficacy of patients to self-monitor and self-adjust the dose of their oral anticoagulants guided by a capillary whole-blood prothrombin time (PT) monitor.

Methods:  This investigation is a retrospective cohort study of 20 patients compared with 20 matched control patients receiving oral anticoagulation at a tertiary medical institution.

Results:  Study patients monitored their PTs 2153 times during a mean interval of 44.7 months compared with 1608 PTs in matched control patients during a mean interval of 42.5 months. Study patients made an average of 11.5 dosage changes per patient, contrasted with 22.7 changes per control patient (P<.001). The PTs in study patients were within the recommended therapeutic range in 88.6% (95% confidence interval, 87.2 to 89.9) of the determinations compared with 68.0% (95% confidence interval, 65.7 to 70.3; P<.001) of the determinations made by the matched control patients. In response to the 2153 PTs, study patients made 67 (3.1%) dosage decisions that were considered incorrect based on physician guidelines. None of these changes led to adverse outcomes. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups.

Conclusions:  Results from what is the first long-term study of patient self-monitoring of PTs and self-adjustment of the warfarin sodium dosage for oral anticoagulation suggest that patients can successfully measure their own PTs, adjust their own warfarin dosage, and achieve a degree of therapeutic effectiveness at least as good, if not better than patients managed in an anti- coagulation clinic. Larger, prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this new approach to therapy and to assess its cost-effectiveness.(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:2185-2189)


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 129

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.