The Importance of Physician Communication on Breast Cancer Screening of Older Women

Sarah A. Fox, EdD, MS; Albert L. Siu, MD, MSPH; Judith A. Stein, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(18):2058-2068. doi:10.1001/archinte.1994.00420180062008.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background:  Breast cancer screening rates, especially for mammography, continue to lag for older women, particularly for women older than 65 years.

Methods:  We investigated the associations of key variables with reported rates of mammography and clinical breast examination in a sample of 972 women older than 50 years; 724 of them were older than 65 years. They were surveyed in late 1990 through 30-minute bilingual telephone interviews.

Results:  Although it was hypothesized that race, age, health status, and physician-patient communication variables would influence utilization rates, only the communication variables (and two access variables) significantly predicted a recent mammogram or clinical breast examination. In particular, the style of the communication—the patient's report of the physician's enthusiasm for mammography when it was discussed with women at the office visit—influenced the women's screening behavior significantly. Women who perceived that their physicians had some enthusiasm for mammography were more than four and a half times more likely than women whose physicians had no or little enthusiasm for mammography to have had one within the previous year. Other findings were that about half of the Los Angeles, Calif, women in this study reported a recent mammogram, an increase from the one third who reported one in the previous survey of 1988; a decline in screening was not reported until after age 75 years. About a quarter of the study women, on the other hand, had never been screened despite the long-standing recommendation for regular screening of women older than 50 years and the risk of breast cancer increasing with age. Surprisingly, women at higher risk of breast cancer were not being screened any more systematically than women at lower risk.

Conclusion:  We conclude that improved physician-patient communication skills could be a highly effective and easy-to-learn strategy to increase overall screening rates.(Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:2058-2068)


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 96

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.