0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Early Identification and Isolation of Inpatients at High Risk for Tuberculosis

Brian Scott, MD; Marlene Schmid, RN; Mary D. Nettleman, MD, MS
Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(3):326-330. doi:10.1001/archinte.1994.00420030136014.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background:  Although it has been recommended that all patients suspected of having tuberculosis be placed in isolation, the feasibility of this recommendation has not been investigated.

Methods:  Forty-three patients with pulmonary tuberculosis were compared with 43 control subjects. The control subjects had submitted expectorated sputum, and were culture negative. Variables included chest roentgenogram results, and risk factors used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, Ga) to identify patients at increased risk for tuberculosis.

Results:  Potential control subjects outnumbered patients by 92:1. Although a positive tuberculin skin test, foreign birth, and weight loss were more common in the patients, 86% of the control subjects had at least one risk factor for tuberculosis. Chest roentgenograms consistent with tuberculosis (cavities or apical or nodular infiltrates) were found in 86% of the patients, but in only 16% of the control subjects (odds ratio, 31.7; 95% confidence interval, 8.6 to 127.7). The positive and negative predictive values of a consistent chest roentgenogram were 6% and 99.8%, respectively. The sensitivity of testing a single sputum specimen was 81%, yet almost half of the control subjects had only one specimen submitted. Of the inpatient cases, 58% were not identified on admission with a median delay of 13 days before isolation.

Conclusions:  Isolating all the patients at the time sputum is submitted for testing is not practical and would have resulted in a 92-fold overuse of isolation rooms. The chest roentgenogram was of great value in identifying patients who did not require isolation and was the best available means of identifying inpatients at high risk for active pulmonary tuberculosis.(Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:326-330)

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 52

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();