0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

The Isoniazid Debate-Reply

Gene J. Colice, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(10):2105. doi:10.1001/archinte.1991.00400100153033.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

In Reply. —  The letters by Tsevat et al and Moulding reaffirm a central point in my article.1 Mathematical modeling works, but the results are critically dependent on the hard data incorporated as probabilities for the occurrence of chance outcomes. When good hard data are not available, investigators have to make choices about which data will be used. Obviously, different choices will lead to different results. I do not intend to quibble over why I chose to use certain data in my analysis. Instead, I want to re-pose a question already raised in my article. The mathematical models have clearly identified the critical variable in the isoniazid chemoprophylaxis debate. Why has the appropriate federal agency not published unimpeachable hard data on the isoniazid hepatitis case—fatality rate for relevant subgroups, eg, those under 35 years of age, pregnant women, women, etc? Only with these data available can we determine for

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();