We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Evaluation of Patient, Physician, Nurse, and Family Attitudes Toward Do Not Resuscitate Orders

Cynthia J. Stolman, PhD; John J. Gregory, MD; Dorothea Dunn, RN, MS; Jeffrey L. Levine, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(3):653-658. doi:10.1001/archinte.1990.00390150129025.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• We investigated attitudes toward resuscitation by interviewing 97 competent patients classified as do not resuscitate, 60 physicians, 80 family members, and 84 nurses. In addition, 58 family members of incompetent do not resuscitate patients were interviewed. Interview patients were generally elderly, female widows with a diagnosis of malignancy. The majority (66%) preferred that their medical decision making be shared with the physician and/or family. Only 38 patients (39%) could correctly define a "living will." After hearing the definition, 59 patients (61 %) thought it was a good idea to ask noncritically ill patients at the time of hospital admission, if they had a living will. Fifty-six patients (58%) said they had discussed resuscitation with their physician, whereas 44 physicians (73%) said they had discussed it with the patient. Only 53 patients (55%) said that they thought their physician understood their wishes. Sixty-five patients (67%) wanted involvement in resuscitation decisions. Fortyeight patients (49%) offered "quality of life" reasons for not wanting to be resuscitated. Sixty-four patients (66%) did not think discussing resuscitation was cruel and insensitive. Eighteen physicians (30%) said they were uncomfortable discussing resuscitation with patients. We recommend introducing the topic of resuscitation early in the patient-physician relationship before diminished competency occurs.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:653-658)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

92 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.