We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

The Value of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Patients With Nodular Thyroid Disease Divided Into Groups of Suspicion of Malignant Neoplasms on Clinical Grounds

J. F. Hamming, MD; B. M. Goslings, MD; G. J. van Steenis, MD; H. van Ravenswaay Claasen; J. Hermans, PhD; C. J. H. van de Velde, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(1):113-116. doi:10.1001/archinte.1990.00390130107016.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• The accuracy of clinical diagnosis and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was evaluated in 169 patients surgically treated for nodular thyroid disease. Patients were divided into three groups with high, moderate, or low suspicion of malignant neoplasms on clinical grounds without previous knowledge of cytologic or histologic results. Histologic examination revealed an overall malignant neoplasm rate of 23%; the rate was 71%, 14%, and 11%for the groups with high, moderate, and low suspicion, respectively. The FNAB diagnostic interpretations of malignant and uncertain were considered positive. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for FNAB were 92%, 71%, and 75%, respectively. Sensitivity in the high-, moderate-, and low-suspicion groups was 95%, 89%, and 88%, respectively; specificity was 88%, 72%, and 67%, respectively; and accuracy was 93%, 75%, and 69%, respectively. In our opinion, all patients in the group with high clinical suspicion need surgical treatment whatever the FNAB result; those with lower degrees of clinical suspicion should also undergo surgery.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:113-116)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

129 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.