0
ARTICLE |

Interpretation of Red Blood Cell Indices by the Nonhematologist

S. B. McClure, MD, PhD; J. E. Bates, MD; J. D. Bessman, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(8):1535. doi:10.1001/archinte.1985.00360080217041.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

To the Editor.  —The message of the article by Hansen et al1 and Howe's2 accompanying editorial in the January issue of the Archives is sobering. During the last decade, not only have electronic counters made the traditional red blood cell counts and indices more reliable for detecting iron deficiency and thalassemia3,4 but new indices, such as the red blood cell distribution width (RDW), are now widely available. The RDW improves the distinction between iron deficiency and heterozygous thalassemia when mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is low5-7 and between iron-deficient and normal subjects when MCV is normal.8 However, in view of the data of Hansen et al, it is unlikely that physicians who do not use the long-established MCV will do much better with the additional information given by the RDW. We share the view that the diagnostic approach to microcytic anemias needs to be improved.Incidentally,

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs