We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Controversy in Internal Medicine II,

Herbert L. Fred, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1975;135(9):1272. doi:10.1001/archinte.1975.00330090144025.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Will Rogers once remarked, "Everyone is ignorant—only on different subjects." In concert with that thesis, Controversy in Internal Medicine II demonstrates convincingly how relatively ignorant we are on 31 major subjects ranging from prevention of atherosclerosis, tuberculosis, and gastroesophageal reflux to management of gallstones, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and adult onset diabetes. To exchange divergent views on these timely matters, the editorial team of Ingelfinger, Ebert, Finland, and Relman selected 89 authorities. The results are instructive, stimulating, and entertaining.

Similar in format to its predecessor, Controversy I, this version focuses on a fresh set of issues. It also contains brief but informative status reports on each of the 23 topics debated in the first volume. Especially worthwhile are the essays by Stead on the dying patient; Macklem on management of acute pulmonary insufficiency; Simpson, Strunin, and Walton on the hepatotoxicity of halothane; Crosby on the treatment of Hodgkin disease; and Millikan


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.