0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.196.119.149. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
ARTICLE |

Treatment of Candida Infection

Philip J. Kozinn, MD; George Degenshein, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1971;128(4):639. doi:10.1001/archinte.1971.00310220147025.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

To the Editor.—  The review of Toala et al on the lack of significance of 371 Candida isolates from specimens submitted for bacteriological examination presents the clinician's dilemma but few clues to its resolution. Although Candida from any specimen should not be ignored, the organism is so ubiquitous that the recovery of the fungus from sputum, stool, vagina, cervix, and umbilicus is of little significance. The recovery of Candida from a noncatheterized or midstream urine is not pathognomonic. Patients with indwelling catheters frequently have Candida in the urine. The recovery of Candida from a local abscess or wound infection rarely warrants systemic treatment. However, Toala et al reported eight isolates from the blood, and nine from intravenous catheters. These 17 isolates out of the 371 are the ones that should give the greatest concern.The lumping of isolates of unequal significance leads to more befuddlement of the clinician. In

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();