0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Diagnostic Cell Pathology in Tissue and Smears.

Richard L. Reece, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1968;121(6):579-580. doi:10.1001/archinte.1968.03640060093032.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

ABSTRACT

Among pathologists there is an old saying: "High power microscopy, low power pathology." This approach works well in tissue work; but according to the author of this text, it makes cytology reports unnecessarily vague. If I correctly interpret his book, he would adapt the adage to read as follows: "Oil immersion microscopy, high power cytology."

Doctor Nieburgs, a pathologist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, has scrutinized hematoxylin and eosin stained cells under the oil immersion lens for 12 years. This technic, he says, lets him look closely enough at the nucleus to sharply differentiate benign and malignant cells. He uses criteria he calls MAC (malignancy associated changes). These include nuclear cytoplasmic ratio, chromocenters and chromatin bands, nuclear clear areas, nucleoli, and multinucleated cells. Once he has studied these, he reports diagnoses "... in terms of pathological tissue alterations."

In other words (and here it seems to me is his main

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();