0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Maladies Et Syndromes Rares Ou Peu Connus.

Piero Mustacchi, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1965;116(3):465. doi:10.1001/archinte.1965.03870030145031.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

ABSTRACT

The history of the ideas about the nature of sickness is epitomized in our attempts at a rational and comprehensive classification of diseases. For a classification to be not only intellectually acceptable but also practical and meaningful, some logical pattern should be followed in tracing the most plausible, though definitely arbitrary, boundary lines between the various subgroups of pathologic entities.

Meaningfulness—never an absolute value in itself—acquires in this context a remarkable volatility. This is displayed quite vividly with every attempt at including newly recognized conditions into a working classification. When the new addition is readily incorporated, the entire scheme gains in meaningfulness. This almost inevitably totters when the rigidity of the existing framework is revealed by its inability to accommodate a new finding. Thus classifications have a built-in obsolescence which is linked to the tide of advancing knowledge and which calls for periodic revisions.

It frequently happens that too little

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();