0
ARTICLE |

Die Zuverlässigkeit der Röntgendiagnostik, besonders Hinsichtlich des Wertes der Urographie, und die Prognose bei Nieren und Harnleitersteinen. Acta radiologica, supplement 32.

Arch Intern Med (Chic). 1938;62(6):1095. doi:10.1001/archinte.1938.00180170195019.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

ABSTRACT

This study consists of an elaborate analysis of over 1,000 cases of renal and ureteral stones, representing all the cases of this type noted in the Lund Clinic since 1923. It is therefore of particular interest to the urologist. The first important problem is the evaluation of the reliability of roentgenographic diagnosis. The introduction of the use of opaque mediums is shown to have improved the results materially. Examination in the presence of pain as compared with examination during the period in which there is no pain also shows interesting differences. The second main aspect of the study deals with prognosis and with conservative and operative methods. Definite differences, for example, as regards recurrences, are brought out.

The work is thoroughly done. The large group of cases adds considerable weight to the conclusions, which in a statistical study lean heavily on numbers. However, the space occupied appears to be considerably

Topics

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs