0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Die Zuverlässigkeit der Röntgendiagnostik, besonders Hinsichtlich des Wertes der Urographie, und die Prognose bei Nieren und Harnleitersteinen. Acta radiologica, supplement 32.

Arch Intern Med (Chic). 1938;62(6):1095. doi:10.1001/archinte.1938.00180170195019.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

ABSTRACT

This study consists of an elaborate analysis of over 1,000 cases of renal and ureteral stones, representing all the cases of this type noted in the Lund Clinic since 1923. It is therefore of particular interest to the urologist. The first important problem is the evaluation of the reliability of roentgenographic diagnosis. The introduction of the use of opaque mediums is shown to have improved the results materially. Examination in the presence of pain as compared with examination during the period in which there is no pain also shows interesting differences. The second main aspect of the study deals with prognosis and with conservative and operative methods. Definite differences, for example, as regards recurrences, are brought out.

The work is thoroughly done. The large group of cases adds considerable weight to the conclusions, which in a statistical study lean heavily on numbers. However, the space occupied appears to be considerably

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();