We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Lack of Positive Correlation Between Statin Use and Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes—Reply

Yoshiharu Wada, MD; Yoshio Nakamura, MD, PhD; Hiroyuki Koshiyama, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(18):2865. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Recently Mundy et al1 have indicated that some statins, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG Co-A) reductase inhibitors in particular, have a potent stimulatory effect on bone formation in vitro and in experimental animals, possibly through increased expression of the bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) gene. Since the dosages of the statins in the study were much larger than would be used clinically, the significance of their stimulatory action in bone formation remains to be elucidated in humans. We investigated the relationship between statin use and lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) in a total of 440 Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes (214 men and 226 women; mean [SE] age, 61.7 [0.9] years). Lumbar BMD was measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (QDR-4500; Hologic Co, Waltham, Mass), as previously described.2,3 Statins were used in 131 subjects: pravastatin in 88.5%, simvastatin in 9.2%, and fluvastatin in 2.3%. Surprisingly, the mean (SE) BMD was significantly lower in subjects receiving statins than in those not receiving statins (0.884 [0.15] vs 0.965 [0.11] g/cm2, P<.001). Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between BMD and the total serum cholesterol level in type 2 diabetes (r = 0.254, P<.001).

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
The Biological Agent

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Is There Potentially Compelling Evidence for a Class Effect?