Editor's Correspondence |

Waiving Informed Consent for Research on Spiritual Matters?

Julie Goldstein, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1870-1871. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


When I first picked up the article by Harris et al,1 I read with open-minded interest: Would such prayer have any effect on the course of illness of the subjects studied? If so, or even if not, how could it hurt? Even for the agnostic, when critically ill, wouldn't most be of the opinion that anything that might help is worth trying, particularly if there is no harm done in the trying?

As I read the study, however, it was not the findings that intrigued me, but the method of study—specifically, the rationale, approved by the institutional review board, to bypass the informed consent of prospective subjects. The authors made a point of elaborating on this choice, anticipating that there would be some reader concern. They offered or implied a number of reasons to support circumventing the informed consent process and justify proceeding with the study: (1) that there is "no known risk" associated with the procedure, (2) that the informed consent discussion with prospective subjects would be likely to bias the study toward inclusion of a propensity of "prayer-receptive" subjects, and (3) that the informed consent inquiry itself could cause distress for the patient, in that the patient would be forced to think about issues of faith at a time when it may not have been that patient's desire to do so.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles