We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Waiving Informed Consent for Research on Spiritual Matters?

Julie Goldstein, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1870-1871. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


When I first picked up the article by Harris et al,1 I read with open-minded interest: Would such prayer have any effect on the course of illness of the subjects studied? If so, or even if not, how could it hurt? Even for the agnostic, when critically ill, wouldn't most be of the opinion that anything that might help is worth trying, particularly if there is no harm done in the trying?

As I read the study, however, it was not the findings that intrigued me, but the method of study—specifically, the rationale, approved by the institutional review board, to bypass the informed consent of prospective subjects. The authors made a point of elaborating on this choice, anticipating that there would be some reader concern. They offered or implied a number of reasons to support circumventing the informed consent process and justify proceeding with the study: (1) that there is "no known risk" associated with the procedure, (2) that the informed consent discussion with prospective subjects would be likely to bias the study toward inclusion of a propensity of "prayer-receptive" subjects, and (3) that the informed consent inquiry itself could cause distress for the patient, in that the patient would be forced to think about issues of faith at a time when it may not have been that patient's desire to do so.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Are the results credible?

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Was the Choice of Participants or Observations Explicit and Comprehensive?