We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Mind-Body Misunderstandings

Martin L. Rossman, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(8):1204. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Thank you for making the body of the debate between Weil and Relman available. Relman's statements that "alternative medicine makes no distinction between objective phenomena and subjective experience," thus allowing "practitioners of alternative medicine to believe in the power of mind and thought to change physical matter and heal organic diseases" is hard to fathom.1 First, it assumes that alternative medicine is an organized, cohesive system, which it is not; and second, it ignores thousands of studies in the literature on behavioral medicine, hypnosis, and biofeedback that have repeatedly demonstrated that mind-body interventions are effective in diverse clinical settings. These include acute and chronic pain, perisurgical anxiety, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative ileus, allergic rhinitis, migraine headache, asthma, irritable bowel syndrome, essential hypertension, Raynaud phenomenon, nausea caused by chemotherapy, and more. He further states that this "basically contradicts the laws of physics in the modern scientific view of nature."1 In fact, the mechanisms of such effects are quite plausible and largely known, involving the modulation of autonomic nervous system function, blood flow, and the secretion of hormones and physiologically active peptides.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections