0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Influenza Vaccination Among the Elderly in the United States—Reply

Lone Simonsen, PhD; Thomas A. Reichert, MD; Cecile Viboud, PhD; William C. Blackwelder, PhD; Robert J. Taylor, PhD; Mark A. Miller, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(17):2039-2040. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.17.2039.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In reply

We disagree with Thompson and colleagues’ assertion that our trends study1 is less robust compared with cohort studies. The strength of our approach is that, unlike cohort studies, we analyzed all deaths in the total elderly US population and are free of the biases to which cohort studies are subject. The comments by Thompson et al are surprising given that they used a similar study design and also found an increase in influenza-related mortality in recent years, which they suggested could be partially explained by aging of the population.2 Nevertheless, the critique by Thompson et al centers on our modeling assumptions, most of which were addressed in our article, including the duration of epidemic periods. We have provided age-adjusted excess mortality estimates, which addressed the paradoxical observation that mortality rates increased concomitant with a quadrupling in elderly vaccination coverage.1 If Thompson et al would also adjust their excess mortality estimates, they could test the robustness of our finding that increasing influenza vaccination coverage was associated with less mortality reduction than expected.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();