0
Editor's Correspondence |

A Painful Setback: Misinterpretation of Analgesic Safety in Older Adults May Inadvertently Worsen Pain Care—Reply

Daniel H. Solomon, MD, MPH; Jeremy A. Rassen, ScD; Robert J. Glynn, PhD; Sebastian Schneeweiss, MD, ScD
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(12):1127. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.263.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In reply

We thank Hwang and colleagues for their interest in our work1 and share with them a strong belief in the importance of adequate pain relief. The focus of our study was the comparative safety of analgesics, and thus the message should not be misconstrued as advocating inadequate pain relief. Many of the limitations that they point out are the usual arguments against observational drug studies. We agree that observational studies of comparative safety have limitations. However, if well designed and conducted with rigor, they can provide important evidence to inform prescribing decisions. We went to great lengths to limit the potential for confounding bias, but a nonexperimental design can never completely rule out such bias, and thus interpretation must be cautious. We are disappointed that they provide no evidence to support their implication that opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have a similar safety profile; our results suggest otherwise.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

June 27, 2011
Daniel H. Solomon, MD, MPH; Jeremy A. Rassen, ScD; Robert J. Glynn, PhD; Sebastian Schneeweiss, MD, ScD
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(12):1127. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.263.
CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs