Author Affiliations: Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Geers et al applied our measures of therapeutic complexity to statin adherence in the Dutch health care system and found less strong correlations between complexity and adherence than we recently reported.1 Their analysis highlights the importance of context in evaluating research results. Like all studies, our findings are primarily generalizable to settings similar to that of the population evaluated. The US health care system is unique in the extent to which coverage and care are fragmented: patients may receive coverage from private or public sources; drug coverage is often “carved out” and administered separately from medical benefits; patients can receive care from numerous different physicians or other health care providers; and prescriptions may be written by multiple prescribers and filled at many pharmacies on numerous visits. We evaluated this last set of factors and found them to be strongly associated with nonadherence. In contrast, Geers and colleagues' analysis based on a health care system with very little complexity for patients to receive and fill prescriptions found the influence of these factors to be smaller. Rather than contradictory, the results of Geers et al amplify the importance of complexity and the potential role of a “pharmacy home” in the US health care system.
Methodological differences may have also contributed to the apparent discrepancy between analyses. We restricted our measures of complexity because of their overlapping nature (eg, number of fills and long-term medication classes) or collinearity with adherence (eg, patients with more fills are by definition more adherent). Geers et al entered many variables into 1 model; this may have spread the predictive ability among multiple measures of the same construct. We evaluated a linear outcome in contrast to the binary measures used by Geers et al. While these models produce different outputs, the nonsignificant 23% increase in the odds of nonpersistence from poor refill consolidation in the much smaller study by Geers et al generates inferences very similar to those from ours. We assessed complexity during the 90-day period after the first statin fill, whereas Geers et al evaluated complexity during the year prior to the first fill. The burden of medication access and filling may be particularly high after, rather than before, starting therapy, and thus the evaluation by Geers et al may have measured exposure variables that would be expected to have less relationship to adherence.
Notwithstanding these differences, the research letter by Geers et al highlights the difficulties evaluating nonadherence in all health care systems and the need to identify modifiable factors unique to each setting.
Correspondence: Dr Choudhry, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont St, Ste 3030, Boston, MA 02120 (email@example.com).
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: This work was supported by a research grant from CVS Caremark. Dr Shrank is supported by a career development award from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-090505).
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more
Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features
Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)
Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 1
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
and access these and other features:
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.