Author Affiliations: Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services (Ms Kleinerman and Dr Mabuchi), and RTI International (Mr Weinstock), Rockville, Maryland.
Meacham et al1 reported a significantly increased risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) following abdominal irradiation for childhood cancer, separate from the effect of total irradiation. Prompted by this finding of an increased risk of DM, we examined the risk of death from diabetes in a cohort of patients with peptic ulcers, who were treated with high-dose abdominal radiation to decrease acid secretion.
This cohort study, originally initiated to investigate the long-term cancer risk associated with radiation,2,3 consisted of 1832 irradiated and 1868 nonirradiated patients with peptic ulcers (treated by other means) at the University of Chicago from 1937 to 1965. Individual radiation doses were estimated to specific organs from radiotherapy records and phantom experimental measurements. Doses to the pancreas ranged from 1 to 38 Gy (to convert to rads, multiply by 100), which is the equivalent of 1000 to 38 000 mSv (1 chest radiograph = 0.1 mSv). The mean age at treatment was 49 years for irradiated and 45 years for nonirradiated patients. Individuals were followed up from the time of treatment for peptic ulcer until death or censored alive as of December 31, 1997. Causes of death were obtained by linking the cohort with the National Death Index. At the end of follow-up, 84% of irradiated and 81% of nonirradiated patients had died.
Thirty persons had died from DM (underlying cause), with 19 in the irradiated and 11 in the nonirradiated group. Using the proportional hazard method, we estimated the relative risk (hazard ratio) of death due to DM by pancreatic dose category after adjusting for age at treatment and attained age. We found a significantly increased risk, with a hazard ratio of 3.79 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-12.0) for the highest-dose category (17-38 Gy) compared with the nonirradiated group (Table). The increased risk at the highest-dose category was observed both within and after 15 years of radiation treatment, but the risk was statistically significant only for 15-or-more-year survivors. Because of the small number of deaths from DM, a detailed analysis of the radiation dose response was not possible, and the data were unclear about the risk at lower doses.
Although the data from Meacham et al1 and ours differ in several respects, our results agree with the finding of an increased risk of DM following high-dose abdominal irradiation. In the study by Meacham et al,1 the patients were irradiated during childhood, whereas the patients with peptic ulcers were irradiated much later in life, mostly at ages 30 years or older. The abdominal dose received by the patients in the study by Meacham et al1 is assumed to be 20 to 30 Gy, whereas in our study, the increased risk of DM was found in those receiving 8 to 31 Gy to the pancreas (mean, 14.6 Gy). Doses to distant organs, such as the brain, were negligible. The association of DM following total body irradiation in children and adults has been documented,4,5 but less well known is the occurrence of DM following abdominal, or more specifically, pancreatic irradiation. Our previous studies3 showed radiation-related risks of pancreatic and gastric cancers in the patients with peptic ulcers. The effect of dying from these fatal cancers, if any, would have been to reduce the number of persons dying from DM in the high-radiation dose group. A small case series reported that DM occurred 6 to 20 years later in 4 of 5 adults who received abdominal radiation for either Hodgkin lymphoma or testis cancer.6 In the study by Meacham et al,1 DM was considered mostly type 2 based on medication history. As we ascertained DM from death certificate information, unresolved questions in our study relate to the type of DM involved or response to insulin treatment, which reflects the degree of pancreatic cell damage from radiation at high-dose levels.
In conclusion, our data provide additional evidence of the association between DM and high-dose pancreatic radiation but leave some questions unresolved, ie, the extent of pancreatic cell damage involved and the risk of DM at lower doses, both of which are important for both clinical practice and public health. Further research is needed to clarify these issues.
Correspondence: Dr Mabuchi, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Blvd, EPS 7038, MSC 7238, Rockville, MD 20852 (email@example.com).
Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Kleinerman and Mabuchi. Acquisition of data: Kleinerman. Analysis and interpretation of data: Kleinerman, Weinstock, and Mabuchi. Drafting of the manuscript: Kleinerman and Mabuchi. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kleinerman, Weinstock, and Mabuchi. Statistical analysis: Weinstock and Mabuchi. Administrative, technical, and material support: Kleinerman and Mabuchi.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more
Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features
Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)
Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 3
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 3
All results at
and access these and other features:
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.