We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Analytical Performance vs Clinical Use of Natriuretic Peptide Measurements

Débora Maria Tavares Andrade, MD; Pedro Guatimosim Vidigal, MD, PhD; Silvana Maria Eloi-Santos, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(14):1274. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.230.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In their elegant meta-analyses, Porapakkham and colleagues1 conclude that B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)-guided therapy reduces all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) compared with usual clinical care.

It is not our purpose to inquire into the methods of statistical or data analysis. However, we would like to call attention to analytical performance of natriuretic peptide measurements. Specific literature is extensive. It is reported that intraindividual biological variation of BNP and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-pro-BNP) can induce misinterpretation on disease progression or treatment optimization.2,3 Moreover, results from testing for imprecision showed systematically high total coefficients of variation. In our clinical laboratory, using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute–standardized protocol to verify method performance,4 data ranged from 0.9% to 50.8%, depending on sample storage and analyte (BNP or NT-pro-BNP). These uncomfortable numbers motivated a recent guidelines document addressing the clinical use of BNP and NT-pro-BNP testing in the context of HF.5

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles