We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Importance of Distinguishing Supported and Unsupported Off-label Drug Use

Surrey M. Walton, PhD; Glen T. Schumock, PharmD, MBA; G. Caleb Alexander, MD, MS; David Meltzer, MD, PhD; Randall S. Stafford, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(7):657-658. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.69.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In their recent commentary, Largent et al1 propose guidance to help clinicians distinguish between well-supported and unsupported off-label prescribing. In 2008, we published a related analysis using nationally representative data from a survey of office-based physicians to identify the frequency of unsupported off-label use of specific therapies.2 We identified medications for which research on off-label use is most urgently needed based on recency of market entry, known adverse effects, high medication cost, high levels of promotional expenditures, and high volume of uses with insufficient evidence. Largent et al1 discussed these same features with the exception of promotional efforts, a factor we consider crucial, given the potential impact of marketing on prescribing. Among the top 25 prioritized medications, antidepressants (escitalopram, trazodone, sertraline, bupropion, amitriptyline, and venlafaxine), antipsychotics (quetiapine and risperidone), and anxiolytics/sedatives (zolpidem, lorazepam, and clonazepam) were prominent. Given the complexities that clinicians face in assessing the evidence base supporting different therapies,3 particular vigilance may be appropriate when using these treatments.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

3 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Reintroducing differences linguistically! Indian J Med Ethics ;1(3):162-6.