Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Rabow); Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco (Dr Smith); Palliative Care Center of the Bluegrass, Hospice of the Bluegrass, Lexington, Kentucky (Ms Braun); and Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee (Dr Weissman).
The field of palliative care has grown rapidly in the United States, with most of the focus on the development of inpatient palliative care consultation services.1 However, the number of outpatient palliative care programs is increasing, with evidence of improved patient and family clinical outcomes.2- 4 Little is known about the structures and processes of existing outpatient palliative care services, including those serving patients with cancer. Learning about existing outpatient palliative care practices may be useful to palliative care programs hoping to expand into the outpatient arena.5 This project was designed to learn the structural components of a national sample of leading outpatient palliative care practices.
Faculty from the Palliative Care Leadership Center (PCLC) Initiative of the Center to Advance Palliative Care sent surveys to 12 leading outpatient palliative care practices in 2008. The 12 practices were selected on the basis of reputation, geographic diversity, and sustainability. We collected information regarding clinics' physical location, census, primary illnesses seen, referral sources, staffing, funding sources, and data tracking. Our project was exempted from institutional review board review.
Of the 12 practices, 11 responded to the survey with data representing the prior year of clinical operation. These practices were part of the following medical centers: Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Fairview Health Services & the University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Medical College of Wisconsin/Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee; Palliative Care Center of the Bluegrass, Lexington, Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; University of California, San Diego John Moores Cancer Center, San Diego; University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; and VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia.
The aggregate results are listed in the Table. Surveyed outpatient palliative care practices are generally small in scope, seeing approximately 500 patients annually over a 3-day-per-week practice. These practices primarily see patients with cancer and are typically affiliated with cancer practices. While outpatient palliative care practices have a great variety of staffing models, most practices include physicians and advance practice nurses. Palliative care practices are supported primarily through an even mix of billing revenues and institutional support.
These data provide a description of a select group of nationally prominent outpatient palliative care practices. Our results are limited by selection bias; the practices surveyed are primarily from large, academic medical centers. Other than a description of the proportion of patients with cancer, our data do not include other patient demographic or disease-specific information (including disease severity and prognosis), which may be important when considering how to structure and staff an outpatient practice. Notably, nearly one-half of the funding for these comparison practices was provided by the institution with which they were affiliated.
Despite its limitations, we believe our survey to be the first of its kind, offering developing palliative care programs a glimpse of existing outpatient practice structures, operations, and finances. This may be especially useful for oncology programs and cancer centers, as palliative care is increasingly recognized as vital to comprehensive cancer care.6 Additional research is needed that expands on this work to measure the clinical impact of outpatient palliative care practices, financial viability, and health system outcomes, including hospital and hospice admission rates.
Correspondence: Dr Rabow, Department of Medicine, UCSF Medical Center at Mount Zion, 1701 Divisadero St, Ste 500, San Francisco, CA 94143-1732 (email@example.com).
Author Contributions: Dr Rabow had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Rabow, Braun, and Weissman. Acquisition of data: Rabow, Smith, Braun, and Weissman. Analysis and interpretation of data: Rabow, Smith, and Weissman. Drafting of the manuscript: Rabow and Smith. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Rabow, Braun, and Weissman. Statistical analysis: Rabow, Smith, Braun, and Weissman. Administrative, technical, and material support: Rabow, Braun, and Weissman. Study supervision: Rabow and Weissman.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: Drs Rabow and Weissman and Ms Braun have received support from the Center to Advance Palliative Care. No funding was sought or received for this research.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 14
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
All results at
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.