0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine |

In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine FREE

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(11):925. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.131.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

EFFECT OF HOSPITAL FOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENT ON CLINICAL EVENT OUTCOMES AND MORTALITY

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has proposed a number of interventions to reduce avoidable hospital readmissions including the arrangement of timely follow-up visits. In this prospective cohort study of 4989 patients dismissed from general medicine services at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, dismissal summaries were searched for the presence of a documented hospital follow-up appointment. No difference was found between those with a documented follow-up appointment vs those without in regards to hospital readmission, emergency department visits, or mortality 30 days following dismissal. These results suggest that national efforts to ensure follow-up for all patients following hospital dismissal may not be beneficial or cost-effective.

See Article

MEDICAL HOME CAPABILITIES OF PRIMARY CARE PRACTICES THAT SERVE SOCIODEMOGRAPHICALLY VULNERABLE NEIGHBORHOODS

Under current proposals to develop “medical homes,” primary care practices that qualify based on structural capabilities can receive enhanced payments. However, primary care practices that serve larger shares of patients from sociodemographically vulnerable neighborhoods might have difficulty making the investments in structural capabilities that would qualify them as medical homes. If so, disparities in care might increase. To address this concern, Friedberg et al studied the capabilities of a statewide sample of Massachusetts primary care practices. Contrary to expectations, they found that practices serving larger shares of patients from sociodemographically vulnerable neighborhoods were more likely to have structural capabilities of the medical home. The relatively large size of disproportionate share practices may offer a partial explanation of this surprising result.

See Article

PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE URINARY ALBUMIN TO CREATININE RATIO IN VETERANS OF DIFFERENT AGES WITH DIABETES

The ability to risk stratify patients with a low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) may be particularly valuable in elderly individuals. Mild to moderate reductions in eGFR in the 45 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 range are common but of uncertain clinical significance at older ages. O’Hare et al measured the independent association of albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) with mortality among a large cohort of US veterans with diabetes across age groups and by level of eGFR. Among cohort members 75 years and older, ACR was independently associated with mortality at all levels of eGFR. If anything, this association was more consistently present at all levels of eGFR in older compared with younger patients. The authors conclude that ACR may be particularly helpful for identifying high-risk members of the large population of older adults with diabetes who have moderate reductions in eGFR.

See Article

WHITE RICE, BROWN RICE, AND RISK OF TYPE 2 DIABETES IN US MEN AND WOMEN

This study evaluated white rice and brown rice consumption in relation to risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) in 3 large prospective cohorts comprising more than 190 000 US male and female health professionals. After adjustment of a multitude of established lifestyle and dietary risk factors of diabetes, higher white rice consumption was associated with increased risk of T2D, whereas higher brown rice consumption was associated with decreased risk of T2D. The pooled relative risks (95% confidence interval) were 1.17 (1.02-1.36), comparing 5 servings per week or more with less than 1 serving per month of white rice, and 0.89 (0.81-0.97), comparing 2 servings per week or more with less than 1 serving per month of brown rice. Substitution of brown rice or whole grains as a food group for the same amount of white rice consumption was associated with a significantly reduced risk of T2D.

See Article

CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING WITH BOTH HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS AND PAPANICOLAOU TESTING VS PAPANICOLAOU TESTING ALONE

Current cervical cancer screening guidelines recommend that the next Papanicolaou test (Pap test) can occur in 3 years for women 30 years or older who have 3 prior normal Pap test results or who have a combined normal Pap and negative human papillomavirus (HPV) test result. Saraiya et al used data from a survey of 1212 US primary care physicians to assess their recommendations on screening intervals that incorporate HPV cotesting compared with Pap testing alone. This study examines whether the addition of HPV testing to routine screening for cervical cancer would prompt primary care physicians to recommend extending screening intervals among women considered to be at low risk for developing precancers or cervical cancer in the next 3 years. Few physicians reported extending screening intervals with HPV cotesting and normal results; this proportion was much lower compared with Pap test–based screening alone.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption

HPV test recommendations by physician specialty. Cotesting indicates an HPV and Pap test; follow-up, using an HPV test to follow up after a Pap test with abnormal results.

Graphic Jump Location

See Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption

HPV test recommendations by physician specialty. Cotesting indicates an HPV and Pap test; follow-up, using an HPV test to follow up after a Pap test with abnormal results.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

208 Views
0 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs