Author Affiliations: Institute for Health Research, Denver, Colorado (Drs Ho, Zeng, and Magid, and Ms Tavel); Denver Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado (Dr Ho); Departments of Medicine (Dr Ho) and Emergency Medicine (Dr Magid), University of Colorado, Denver; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland (Dr Selby); and HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Drs O’Connor and Margolis).
Since publication of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) (December 2002) and Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-7) (May 2003) guidelines, thiazide diuretics have been promoted as the preferred initial agents for hypertension treatment, especially among patients without compelling indications for an alternative medication class.1,2 A few prior studies demonstrated a slight increase in thiazide use shortly following the publication of these data, but the extent to which thiazides continue to be used as a first-line agent in hypertension treatment in current practice is unclear.3,4
The present study assessed time trends in thiazide use as a first-line agent for hypertension treatment from 2002 through 2007 in the Cardiovascular Research Network (CVRN) Hypertension Registry. We compared thiazide use vs other classes of antihypertensive agents as the initial medication among patients with incident hypertension and without compelling indications (ie, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure) for another class of medication.
The CVRN Hypertension Registry includes adult patients with hypertension at 3 large integrated health care delivery systems. Patients with hypertension were identified by diagnostic codes, electronic blood pressure measurements, or antihypertensive medication dispensings available from electronic health records and administrative databases at each site using a published algorithm.5
The present analysis included patients with incident hypertension who were started on therapy with antihypertensive medications. Incident hypertension was defined as having a 1 year or longer health plan membership prior to meeting hypertension registry entry criteria, without a prior hypertension diagnosis, and without prior pharmacy dispensing for antihypertensive medication. Pharmacy records include all medications dispensed from health plan outpatient pharmacies or claims filed for medications. All patients included in the analysis had prescription drug coverage, which included no copayment or nominal copayment for most hypertension agents. For combination pills containing thiazides, the combination pill was categorized as a thiazide in the analysis. For other combination pills, the assigned class was based on the first listed medication in the combination.
For patients without compelling indications and who were started on therapy with antihypertensive medications (n = 182 317), mean (SD) systolic blood pressure was 154.0 (15.3) mm Hg and mean diastolic blood pressure was 90.8 (11.6) mm Hg across the study years (Table). In 2002, 41.9% initiated therapy with thiazides, which increased to 56.1% in 2003 (Figure). Thereafter, there was a plateau in thiazide use for several years. In 2006-2007, thiazide use increased again, reaching 61.0% in 2007 (P < .001 for trend in thiazide use). This was driven mainly by the use of combination pills, with thiazide and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor as the most common combination.
Trends in the prescription of initial antihypertensive medications among patients without compelling indications from 2002 through 2007. ACE indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; CCB, calcium channel blocker; CCB DHP, dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker; CCB non-DHP, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker; DIUR KSPARE, potassium-sparing diuretic.
We found that there has been a slow but persistent increase in thiazide use as initial therapy for hypertension treatment among patients without compelling indications for other agents across 3 large integrated health care systems. These findings demonstrate trends in hypertension treatment consistent with current guidelines and mitigate recent concerns about the lack of impact of the ALLHAT study or JNC-7 guidelines.6
During the study period, hypertension practice guidelines and algorithms were made available via paper format and/or the Web within each health care system and disseminated through educational conferences. These guidelines were consistent with national guidelines (eg, JNC-7) on hypertension management. In addition, generic medications were encouraged over brand name medications, but medications representing all therapeutic classes for hypertension treatment were available. Clinicians were encouraged to follow evidence-based practice; however, there was no mandate to use a specific agent in the initial treatment of hypertension.
While the patterns of care observed may not be generalizable to other settings, these 3 health care systems care for over 4 million patients in geographically distinct areas and the patient cohort included a clinically and demographically diverse population, approximately 50% female and 17% African American/Hispanic patients. Our findings of a slow but persistent increase in thiazide use suggest that clinical practice guidelines may have an impact on practice within these health care systems.
Correspondence: Dr Ho, Denver VA Medical Center, 1055 Clermont St (111B), Denver, CO 80220 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Author Contributions: Drs Ho and Magid had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Ho, Selby, O’Connor, and Magid. Acquisition of data: Tavel, Selby, O’Connor, Margolis, and Magid. Analysis and interpretation of data: Ho, Zeng, Selby, O’Connor, Margolis, and Magid. Drafting of the manuscript: Ho. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Ho, Zeng, Tavel, Selby, O’Connor, Margolis, and Magid. Obtained funding: Selby and Magid. Administrative, technical, and material support: Tavel, Selby, O’Connor, and Magid. Study supervision: Magid.
Financial Disclosure: Dr Ho serves as a consultant for WellPoint Inc. Dr Margolis receives research support from Bristol Myers Squibb in the form of an institutional research grant.
Funding/Support: This study was funded by grant U19HL091179 from the National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute as part of the Cardiovascular Research Network. Dr Ho is supported by a VA Research & Development Career Development Award (05-026-2).
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 10
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Patient Have a Hemorrhagic Stroke?
The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
All results at
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.