We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

A Case for Consultation Codes—Reply

Joel Shalowitz, MD, MBA
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(9):836-837. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.121.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

Since the online publication of my article in October 2009,1 I have received a number of personal e-mails with comments not always as mild as those of Dr Rochmis. As is the case with his letter, most vilified me for suggesting equity in payment for cognitive services considering the time, risk, and skill needed to treat. While I do not contend that the average internist can treat a patient with complex rheumatoid arthritis as well as Dr Rochmis, by the same token, I venture to say he probably does not have the expertise of a general internist in treating a noncompliant diabetic patient with hypertension and heart failure. Which service is worth more, given equal time spent? That said, all who contacted me missed the following facts: First, I found that almost all consults were billed as consults, while almost all referrals were billed as (the higher paid) consults. I will leave to the reader the ethical implication of this finding. To correct this problem, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services needed to either monitor the billing more closely (at a cost that was not stated in the article) or eliminate the codes (which is what it has done, effective January 1, 2010). Second, I never said that physicians were paid adequately. I do lament, however, that there is not an adequate representation of primary care physicians on the American Medical Association's Relative Value Update Committee (RUC), which recommends rates for all physicians. In contrast to Dr Rochmis (who, until January, could bill the higher paid consult codes), in 24 years practicing as a primary care internist, my partners and I always accepted Medicare assignment and never turned away those patients, no matter how long it took to address their problems. Third, this letter and others I received ignore the ability of the consulting physician to bill a higher level service if the time component is more than 50% of the visit, eg, if a rheumatologist spends 60 minutes counseling a patient about his or her rheumatoid arthritis.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Care at the Close of Life: Evidence and Experience
Prognostic Consultation

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis