0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary |

The Metabolic Syndrome as a Cluster of Risk Factors: Is the Whole Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts?  Comment on “The Metabolic Syndrome, Its Component Risk Factors, and Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis”

Eric L. Ding, ScD; Liesbeth A. Smit, MSc; Frank B. Hu, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(5):484-485. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.552.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

From the conception of MetS, much debate has continued regarding the recognition of MetS as a real syndrome and whether it is an informative clinical tool. Supposedly, the MetS combination of 3 of its 5 components (hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia, hypertension, low HDL-C level, and greater waist circumference/adiposity) should not only be helpful in identifying cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk but also represent symptoms of an underlying disease or condition.

Two main questions now persist: (1) whether MetS improves prediction and better characterizes people at risk of CVD rather than simply identifies the presence of the individual component risk factors, and (2) whether the syndrome possesses an underlying pathophysiologic characteristic or is merely an aggregated post hoc collection of correlated cardiovascular risk factors.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

253 Views
13 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
An Illustration of Bias and Random Error

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
An Illustration of Bias and Random Error

brightcove.createExperiences();