We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Error in Table 3 in: Meta-analysis of the Impact of 9 Medication Classes on Falls in Elderly Persons

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(5):477. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.510.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Error in Table 3. In the article titled “Meta-analysis of the Impact of 9 Medication Classes on Falls in Elderly Persons” by Woolcott et al, published in the November 23, 2009, issue of the Archives (2009;169[21]:1952-1960), the second half of Table 3 was inadvertently omitted. The complete Table should have read as follows:

Table 3.

Pooled Bayesian Odds Ratios and Subgroup Sensitivity Analysis

Study CharacteristicAntihypertensivesDiureticsβ-BlockersSedatives/HypnoticsNo.aOR (95% CI)No.aOR (95% CI)No.aOR (95% CI)No.aOR (95% CI)No. of subjects497610145835444684No. taking drug1482237414321737All studies61.24 (1.01-1.50)91.07 (1.01-1.14)41.01 (0.86-1.17)71.47 (1.35-1.62)Population Community41.29 (1.00-1.65)31.08 (1.01-1.16)20.98 (0.79-1.18)b51.50 (1.36-1.67)  <35% Fallers31.34 (0.93-1.91)21.09 (1.00-1.17)10.94 (0.75-1.16)31.62 (1.44-1.84)b  ≥35% Fallers11.11 (0.78-1.58)c11.04 (0.87-1.24)11.13 (0.72-1.70)21.22 (1.00-1.48)b Long-term care10.80 (0.40-1.60)c31.02 (0.84-1.25)21.18 (0.83-1.88)b11.38 (1.14-1.74) Other11.19 (0.77-1.83)c31.06 (0.82-1.38)00.43 (0.19-0.97)b11.56 (1.19-2.05)Mean age of study subjects, y ≤7541.33 (1.03-1.68)41.11 (1.03-1.20)b20.93 (0.71-1.18)41.54 (1.39-1.72) >7521.04 (0.79-1.38)c50.96 (0.84-1.08)b21.02 (0.81-1.28)31.37 (1.19-1.60)Medication/falls ascertainment Good11.19 (0.77-1.83)c51.04 (0.89-1.23)10.87 (0.69-1.07)11.66 (1.25-2.22) Poor51.24 (0.97-1.54)41.09 (1.02-1.16)31.02 (0.84-1.21)61.43 (1.30-1.58)Study type Case-control21.09 (0.80-1.50)c51.11 (0.94-1.32)10.87 (0.55-1.37)11.62 (1.31-2.00)b Cohort31.34 (0.93-1.91)11.05 (0.97-1.15)01.00 (0.78-1.30)31.24 (1.05-1.45)b Cross-sectional11.11 (0.78-1.58)c31.11 (1.00-1.24)31.02 (0.79-1.24)31.56 (1.39-1.76)bNeuroleptics/AntipsychoticsAntidepressantsBenzodiazepinesNarcoticsNSAIDsStudy CharacteristicNo.aOR (95% CI)No.aOR (95% CI)No.aOR (95% CI)No.aOR (95% CI)No.aOR (95% CI)No. of subjects86172046932684128117828No. taking drug1303302150501314429All studies41.59 (1.37-1.83)91.68 (1.47-1.91)111.57 (1.43-1.72)40.96 (0.78-1.18)41.21 (1.01-1.44)Population Community21.76 (1.41-2.18)b41.68 (1.39-2.03)61.55 (1.36-1.73)21.22 (0.79-1.66)11.12 (0.91-1.36)  <35% Fallers11.75 (1.36-2.24)31.62 (1.22-2.03)51.53 (1.31-1.75)21.32 (0.87-1.80)11.08 (0.86-1.34)  ≥35% Fallers11.78 (1.33-2.38)c12.30 (1.41-3.69)11.58 (1.05-2.45)00.71 (0.27-1.82)01.34 (0.83-2.15) Long-term care11.55 (1.24-1.95)31.63 (1.35-1.98)21.43 (1.11-1.85)11.03 (0.61-1.54)11.41 (1.05-1.89) Other11.02 (0.65-1.61)b21.70 (1.17-2.48)31.91 (1.43-2.55)10.94 (0.72-1.24)21.62 (0.21-12.60)cMean age of study subjects, y ≤7511.72 (1.32-2.27)21.66 (1.33-2.04)51.55 (1.26-1.83)10.96 (0.73-1.27)21.26 (0.92-1.70) >7531.63 (1.27-2.03)71.79 (1.47-2.16)61.56 (1.39-1.77)31.24 (0.75-1.65)21.17 (0.95-1.43)Medication/falls ascertainment Good21.34 (1.05-1.68)b41.68 (1.39-2.06)51.65 (1.39-1.98)20.81 (0.55-1.20)31.59 (1.11-2.24)b Poor21.79 (1.46-2.17)b51.64 (1.37-1.94)61.54 (1.36-1.72)21.11 (0.85-1.42)11.12 (0.93-1.35)bStudy type Case-control11.23 (0.92-1.63)31.83 (1.42-2.35)32.18 (1.57-3.12)b10.21 (0.10-0.45)b,c21.62 (0.21-12.60)c Cohort01.90 (1.35-2.67)21.67 (1.36-2.02)31.51 (1.29-1.75)b11.49 (1.22-1.83)b,c0NA Cross-sectional31.67 (1.38-2.00)41.57 (1.25-1.96)51.49 (1.24-1.73)b21.18 (0.90-1.53)b,c21.44 (0.49-4.03)c

 Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; OR, odds ratio.

aRefers to new study only.

bGreater than 95% posterior probability that the difference between ORs is greater than 0.

cAttained by random-effects inverse-variance model (frequentist) owing to unstable Bayesian model.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

3 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Falls, Older Adults

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Pretest Probabilities and Likelihood Ratios for Clinical Findings