0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Improving Health Care Provider Notification in an Academic Setting: A Cascading System of Alerts

Craig T. Tenner, MD; Neil M. Shapiro, MD; Alan Wikler, PsyD
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(4):392. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.9.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

We applaud Singh and colleagues1 for their study “Timely Follow-up of Abnormal Diagnostic Tests Results in an Outpatient Setting: Are Electronic Medical Records Achieving Their Potential?” Like the authors, we also work at a tertiary Department of Veterans Affairs medical center with the same electronic medical record system and are affiliated with a large academic residency program. The issue of timely follow-up of abnormal test results has been of major concern at our facility, especially by house officers, who spend various amounts of time at our hospital. Frequently, the house officer who places an order is not stationed at our hospital when the results become available. To address this problem, we have developed a cascading system of notifications to improve the timeliness of health care provider notification.2 All residents are now assigned an attending surrogate who becomes the recipient of electronic test results that have not been acknowledged by the ordering resident in a timely manner. The surrogate is more aptly able to arrange necessary follow-up of test results and notifies the resident accordingly. If a surrogate becomes unavailable, the results can be forwarded to a higher-level supervisor for acknowledgment, generating a system of cascading notifications. Based on the type of result, we have designated limits to how long a test result can remain unacknowledged before being forwarded to the surrogate. Noncritical laboratory values are forwarded if unprocessed in 72 hours. It is important to emphasize that critical values are handled in a different manner. Although an electronic alert is sent, critical values are also called by the laboratory directly to a physician with verbal confirmation of the abnormality (with a “write down/read back policy”). Although this cascade system does not entirely eliminate the problem of timely follow-up, it has markedly improved the process since its inception.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Arthritis among veterans - United States, 2011-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63(44):999-1003.
Challenges and Resilience in the Lives of Adults with Sickle Cell Disease. Soc Work Public Health Published online Nov 6, 2014.;
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com
brightcove.createExperiences();