0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letters |

Frequency and Clinical Importance of Pages Sent to the Wrong Physician FREE

Brian M. Wong, MD; Sherman Quan, BSc; C. Mark Cheung, MD; Dante Morra, MD, MBA; Peter G. Rossos, MD, MBA; Khalil Sivjee, MD; Robert Wu, MD, MSc; Edward E. Etchells, MD, MSc
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(11):1069-1081. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.117.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Effective communication between health care providers is essential to patient safety and quality of care.16 A retrospective study of 14 000 admissions found that communication failures were the most common cause of preventable disability or death and were nearly twice as common as those due to inadequate medical skill.6 A major type of communication failure is sending a page to the wrong physician. Prior studies have described paging problems such as paging the wrong physician, unanswered pages, and delayed responses but do not quantify the extent of the problem.3 Our primary aim was to quantify the frequency of pages sent to the wrong physician in 2 academic teaching hospitals and to examine the potential clinical importance of these errors.

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC) and the Toronto General Hospital (TGH) are tertiary care academic teaching hospitals affiliated with the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. There are 4 dedicated general internal medicine wards with more than 3000 total admissions at each site per year. Physicians and nurses can send numeric or text (SHSC only) pages at our hospitals and rely on paper monthly call schedules to determine which physician to page.

We reviewed all available paging records from our communications department for all residents (28 of 38 [74%]) rotating through each study site in January and February 2008. Our primary outcome measure was the percentage of pages that were sent to the wrong physician, defined as any page that was sent to a resident during a scheduled absence when the resident was known to be off duty and out of the hospital (postcall afternoon, academic days, longitudinal clinic, off-duty evenings and weekends, and vacations). Three investigators independently judged potential clinical importance by classifying text pages as an emergency if its content warranted immediate attention, urgent if its content warranted attention within the hour, and nonurgent if its content did not require a response within 1 hour.

We reported descriptive data as counts and percentages, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for categorical data, or mean and standard deviation for continuous data. A weighted κ analysis was carried out to assess rater agreement when judging critical pages. The research ethics boards at both institutions approved this study.

During the 2-month study period, 1409 of 10 190 pages were sent to the wrong physician (14%; 95% CI, 13%-15%). These were typically sent during the postcall period (36%; 95% CI, 33%-39%), during evenings (22%; 95% CI, 19%-25%), and during scheduled academic half days (21%; 95% CI, 18%-24%). A review of the text pages sent to the wrong physician (213 of 1409 [15%]) revealed that 15% (95% CI, 10%-20%) of these pages were emergency pages that warranted immediate attention and 32% (95% CI, 25%-39%) were urgent pages that warranted a response within the hour (κ = 0.70-0.73) (Table).

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable. Clinical Importance of Pages Sent to the Wrong Physician

We found that 14% of all pages were sent to the wrong physician when he or she was not on duty and out of the hospital and that 47% of these were an emergency or urgent. This extrapolates to over 4300 pages per year at each hospital, including approximately 2000 pages requiring an emergency or urgent response. These incorrect pages create delays and inefficiencies in care that disrupt workflow and represent potential threats to patient safety. Our results were consistent across 2 teaching hospitals with different call schedule and paging systems. Limitations of our study include that our retrospective method for classifying pages was not designed to detect pages sent to the wrong physician during regular hours and may have misclassified pages. We were also unable to determine how the sender of the pages resolved the paging error, so it is difficult to say what impact these errors had on patient care. Despite this, we believe that the frequency of pages sent to the wrong physician is too high and are taking steps to reduce the potential for these errors.

Correspondence: Dr Wong, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Room D474, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada (BrianM.Wong@Sunnybrook.ca).

Author Contributions: All authors have made a substantial, direct, intellectual contribution to this study. All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Wong, Quan, Morra, Rossos, Wu, and Etchells. Acquisition of data: Wong and Quan. Analysis and interpretation of data: Wong, Quan, Cheung, Sivjee, Wu, and Etchells. Drafting of the manuscript: Wong and Etchells. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Quan, Cheung, Morra, Rossos, Sivjee, Wu, and Etchells. Administrative, technical, and material support: Wong, Quan, Cheung, Morra, Rossos, and Etchells. Study supervision: Morra and Etchells.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was funded by the Chair of Medicine/Academic Hospitals Quality and Safety Partners Intramural Grant (Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada).

Role of the Sponsors: The funding program had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the research letter.

Additional Contributions: Donald Redelmeier, MD, MSc, provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of this research letter and Alex Kiss, PhD, provided assistance with statistical analysis.

Alvarez  GCoiera  E Interdisciplinary communication: an uncharted source of medical error? J Crit Care 2006;21 (3) 236- 242
PubMed Link to Article
Baker  GRNorton  PGFlintoft  V  et al.  The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 2004;170 (11) 1678- 1686
PubMed Link to Article
Coiera  ETombs  V Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: an observational study. BMJ 1998;316 (7132) 673- 676
PubMed Link to Article
Dwyer  K Flawed communication systems result in patient harm. Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14 (1) 77
PubMed Link to Article
Southwick  LM Communication misadventures and medical errors. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002;28 (8) 461- 462; author reply 462-463
PubMed
Wilson  RMRunciman  WBGibberd  RWHarrison  BTNewby  LHamilton  JD The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1995;163 (9) 458- 471
PubMed

Figures

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable. Clinical Importance of Pages Sent to the Wrong Physician

References

Alvarez  GCoiera  E Interdisciplinary communication: an uncharted source of medical error? J Crit Care 2006;21 (3) 236- 242
PubMed Link to Article
Baker  GRNorton  PGFlintoft  V  et al.  The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 2004;170 (11) 1678- 1686
PubMed Link to Article
Coiera  ETombs  V Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: an observational study. BMJ 1998;316 (7132) 673- 676
PubMed Link to Article
Dwyer  K Flawed communication systems result in patient harm. Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14 (1) 77
PubMed Link to Article
Southwick  LM Communication misadventures and medical errors. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002;28 (8) 461- 462; author reply 462-463
PubMed
Wilson  RMRunciman  WBGibberd  RWHarrison  BTNewby  LHamilton  JD The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1995;163 (9) 458- 471
PubMed

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 15

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles