Cicletanine for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension FREE

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (World Health Organization [WHO] group I pulmonary hypertension) is characterized by elevated pulmonary arterial pressure leading to progressive dyspnea, right-sided heart failure, and ultimately death. The goal in treating PAH is to reduce pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary artery pressure as well as improve the functional status of the patient. The pathogenic hallmark of PAH is increased pulmonary vascular resistance, a result of vasoconstriction, vascular remodeling (abnormal proliferation of smooth muscle and sometimes other vascular tissue), and in situ thrombosis. An important root cause of this pathologic condition is endothelial dysfunction, ie, the uncoupling of endothelial nitric oxide synthetase (eNOS), which drives the decrease in the production of the endogenous vasodilator nitric oxide along with increases in the production of the reactive oxygen species peroxynitrite and superoxide.

Unfortunately, for many patients the current treatments used for PAH have limited efficacy and may not substantially alter the clinical course of the disease. This is probably, at least in part, because drugs currently approved for PAH (prostacyclins, endothelin receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors) do not comprehensively address endothelial dysfunction itself but instead endeavor to counterbalance some subset of its downstream effects (ie, decreased prostacyclin production, increased endothelin production, and decreased nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate production; Figure 1). We describe patient with progressive disease who was not responding to maximal conventional therapy and subsequently responded to treatment with cicletanine, an eNOS coupler currently used in Europe for systemic hypertension.

A 33-year-old woman with progressive idiopathic PAH was admitted for progressive dyspnea on exertion and right heart failure. One year prior to admission, she was diagnosed as having idiopathic PAH (right ventricular pressure of 80/10 mm Hg) (right ventricular end-diastolic pressure of 33 mm Hg), pulmonary artery pressure of 72/33 mm Hg) (main pulmonary artery pressure of 50 mm Hg), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 8 mm Hg). She initially responded to treatment with intravenous treprostinil and sildenafil citrate, improving from WHO functional class IV to WHO functional class III. On admission, her blood pressure was 92/50 mm Hg; heart rate, 122/min; respiratory rate, 22/min; and oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, 89% with 5-L/min nasal cannula oxygen. Findings from admission echocardiography and right-heart catheterization confirmed severe PAH and right ventricular dysfunction, with a mean pulmonary artery pressure of 55 mm Hg, right ventricular end-diastolic pressure of 18 mm Hg, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 8 mm Hg (mixed venous oxygen saturation of 57%). On the basis of her symptoms, the patient was categorized as WHO functional class IV. She had been receiving pulmonary vasodilator therapy with high-dose intravenous treprostinil and sitaxentan, in addition to furosemide (80 mg twice daily) and spironolactone (50 mg twice daily). While in the intensive care unit, she began therapy with tadalafil (20 mg once daily) and inhaled nitric oxide. Despite increases in the dose of treprostinil (139 to 143 ng/kg of body weight/min) and tadalafil (20 mg/d for 3 weeks to 40 mg/d for 1 week prior to the initiation of cicletanine therapy), her right heart dysfunction did not improve. She could not be weaned from nitric oxide, as attempts to discontinue treatment with the inhaled nitric oxide resulted in a significant, symptomatic decrease in cardiac output. She had marked volume overload, and her functional status remained unchanged (WHO class IV). The patient was not interested in lung transplantation; therefore, compassionate treatment with cicletanine was begun at 50 mg/d and was increased to a dose of 150 mg/d over a 3-day period. Immediately prior to the initiation of cicletanine therapy, she had a 6-minute walk distance of 30 m while breathing nitric oxide at 80 parts per million. Over the subsequent week she was weaned off nitric oxide and was transferred to the cardiac step-down unit. On the day of transfer, her central venous oxygen saturation was 71%. A maintenance regimen of treprostinil (143 ng/kg/min), tadalafil (40 mg/d), sitaxsentan (100 mg/d), furosemide (80 mg twice daily), spironolactone (50 mg twice daily), and cicletanine (150 mg/d) was prescribed, and the patient (now classified as WHO class III) was discharged home. Figure 2 details the patient's progress. After 3 months of cicletanine therapy, her oxygen saturation was 98% at rest while breathing room air; her heart rate had decreased from 135/min to 105/min, her blood pressure had improved 120/60 mm Hg; her weight had decreased from 75 kg to 60 kg; and her 6-minute walk distance had increased from 30 m to 446 m. Her serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level had decreased from 4409 pg/mL to 1859 pg/mL (age corrected normal range, 0-450 pg/mL). She no longer required high doses of diuretics, and furosemide therapy was decreased from 80 mg twice per day to 40 mg once per day. Sitaxsentan therapy was discontinued, and ambrisentan therapy (5 mg/d) was begun. She required no other changes in her maintenance vasodilator therapy. After 6 months of therapy her medical regimen remained unchanged. Her 6-minute walking distance was stable, as were her vital signs. Her N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level had decreased further to 1525 pg/mL. Her functional class had steadily improved to WHO class II. Unfortunately, 3 weeks after her 6-month follow-up visit, she visited our hospital for septic shock due to a staphylococcal Hickman catheter infection. The catheter was being used for continuous delivery of treprostinil. She did not recover and died of cardiac arrest.

To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of administration of cicletanine, an eNOS coupler, to an adult patient with PAH. The endothelial isoform of nitric oxide synthase, eNOS, is one of 3 nitric oxide synthase isoenzymes that convert L-arginine to L-citrulline, resulting in the production of the key signaling molecule nitric oxide.¹ Agonists of diverse G protein–coupled cell surface receptors acutely activate eNOS by physical stimuli such as hemodynamic shear stress and by hypoxia.² Nitric oxide generated by eNOS regulates blood pressure, platelet aggregation, leukocyte adherence, and vascular smooth muscle cell mitogenesis. When eNOS is uncoupled (ie, not dimerized), production of nitric oxide is decreased and production of the reactive oxygen species peroxynitrite and superoxide is increased; vascular remodeling may also ensue. Uncoupling of eNOS is referred to as endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial dysfunction is associated with the pathogenesis of a variety of forms of pulmonary hypertension^3- 4 as well as several other disorders, including heart failure^5- 7 and systemic hypertension.⁸

An increasing amount of evidence supports a potential role for cicletanine in the treatment of disorders associated with endothelial dysfunction, including PAH. Several preclinical studies have supported the view that cicletanine acts as a coupler of eNOS by showing increases in nitric oxide production and decreases in the production of peroxynitrite or decreases in superoxide (in some cases all 3 in the same study).^9- 13 There is an appreciable number of clinical studies of cicletanine showing favorable effects in endothelial dysfunction–associated disorders, in particular hypertension.¹⁴ Of note is a published study showing improvement in pulmonary hemodynamics among patients taking cicletanine for pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic hypoxia (WHO group III pulmonary hypertension) due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.¹⁵ In addition, there was a favorable study of cicletanine in pulmonary hypertension associated with left-sided heart failure (WHO group II pulmonary hypertension)¹⁶; in this case, the patients were on a heart transplant waiting list and improved on average 0.9 New York Heart Association functional status points from baseline. Cicletanine is the first agent of which we are aware of having favorable clinical signals in all 3 of these types (WHO groups I, II, and III) of pulmonary hypertension. Furthermore, there are several animal studies showing favorable cardiac effects, including reversal of cardiac hypertrophy¹⁷ and reduction in extent of ischemia-induced myocardial infarction.^18- 19

The greater than 50% reduction in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level in our patient, along with her marked clinical improvement as evidenced by a decrease in supplemental oxygen requirements and increased walking distance, is consistent with the hypothesis that cicletanine had a beneficial effect on both pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular function in this patient with severe idiopathic PAH. This in turn is consistent with the view that cicletanine directly treats endothelial dysfunction, which is thought to be a principal driver both in pulmonary hypertension and cardiac failure.

While we believe cicletanine played a pivotal role in the observed improvement in this patient, an obvious limitation to the interpretation of our findings was the combination of multiple interventions in close succession. This limits our ability to separate clearly the effects of the different interventions.

In conclusion, cicletanine, an eNOS coupler, may represent a novel therapy to target both vascular remodeling and right ventricular dysfunction in PAH. The initial adult PAH case reported herein gives hope that cicletanine could represent a new, important class of drugs to treat pulmonary hypertension. Further study of this agent in PAH is warranted.

Correspondence: Dr Waxman, Pulmonary Vascular Disease Program, Pulmonary Critical Care Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White-905, Boston, MA 02114 (abwaxman@partners.org).

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Waxman and Cornett. Acquisition of data: Waxman and Lawler. Analysis and interpretation of data: Waxman, Lawler, and Cornett. Drafting of the manuscript: Waxman, Lawler, and Cornett. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Waxman and Cornett. Obtained funding: Cornett. Administrative, technical, and material support: Lawler and Cornett. Study supervision: Waxman and Lawler.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.