0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Shared Decision Making:  Have We Missed the Obvious?

Janice L. Hanson, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(13):1368-1370. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.13.1368.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

A decade ago, we saw little in the medical literature about shared decision making, but that has changed. The last several years have brought a proliferation of literature about shared decision making, participatory decision making, decision aids, and related topics. A recent PubMed search for “shared decision making” resulted in 1891 articles. Although we may be tempted to think that we know all that we need to know about it, the article in this issue of the Archives by Young et al1 adds a twist to the thinking about this somewhat unsettling topic. These researchers not only found that the physicians in their study engaged in very little shared decision making—as many other researchers have also documented27—they also found that a very minor action by patients stimulated a little more sharing of decisions on the part of physicians. This suggests that both parties influence one another, yet we have put most of our research emphasis on the role of physicians in engaging patients, neglecting the interactive nature of sharing between the 2 parties. With this slightly prismatic shift in perspective, I would like to challenge some prevalent notions that arise in conversations about shared decision making.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 22

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();