We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Treatment of Adults With Acute Pharyngitis in Primary Care Practice

Alan L. Bisno, MD; Michael A. Gerber, MD; Edward L. Kaplan, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2291. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.20.2291-b.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


As members of the IDSA guideline committee on the management of GAS pharyngitis,1 we read with interest the article by Linder et al2 and editorial by Centor and Cohen3 regarding the management of adults with acute pharyngitis. As a point of clarification, we wish to point out that the article and editorial err in stating that the 4-point Centor criteria4 were explicitly recommended by the IDSA. We believe that clinical algorithms such as that of Centor et al4 can be most helpful in identifying patients whose risk of GAS pharyngitis is low enough to preclude the necessity of diagnostic testing. We do not, however, recommend their use in lieu of such testing in adult patients with sore throat, whose clinical findings are more highly suggestive of GAS infection. In this regard, we differ with the clinical practice guideline endorsed by the ACP.5 For example, Linder et al2 found that 60% of their patients meeting the 4 Centor criteria, who could be treated empirically according to the ACP guideline, nevertheless had negative rapid antigen detection test results and/or throat cultures for GAS. We were gratified to read the authors' conclusion that “perfect adherence to the IDSA strategy would result in the lowest rate of antibiotic prescribing.”2(p1378)

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence To Support the Update

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence to Support the Update