We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

Prolonged Ventricular Repolarization in Hypertension: Is It Heart Rate?

Christian Funck-Brentano, MD, PhD; Beny Charbit, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(19):2157. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.19.2157-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We read with great interest the article by Schillaci et al1 examining the relationship between heart rate–corrected QT (QTc) interval duration and morbidity and mortality in hypertension. This article adds to the numerous articles relating QTc prolongation to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.2

However, the Bazett correction formula, which has been widely used in epidemiological studies, including the study by Schillaci et al,1 is well known to overcorrect QTc interval (ie, to yield falsely prolonged QTc values) when heart rate increases above 60 beats/min.3,4 Schillaci et al found a strong residual direct correlation between QTc and heart rate but apparently did not examine the role of heart rate in predicting the risks they assessed. Surprisingly, they did not include heart rate as a potential confounding covariate for the association between QTc interval prolongation and risks in their multivariate analyses. Since increased heart rate is associated with cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality independently from blood pressure,5 as well as with falsely prolonged QTc values when the Bazett formula is used,3,4 we wonder whether Schillaci et al1 would reexamine their data to determine whether heart rate, rather than Bazett-corrected QTc, was associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in their study. In view of the strong, and expected, association they found between Bazett-corrected QTc and heart rate, we believe that alternative (and more appropriate than the Bazett formula) methods of QT corrections should be tested in this data set before QTc can be considered as a useful prognostic factor in hypertension. From a pathophysiological point of view, it is conceivable that both QTc and heart rate may come out as prognostic variables, but both need to be studied and reported in prognostic studies.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Patient Have a Hemorrhagic Stroke?

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Quick Reference