0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

What About Other Causes of Death?

Mark J. Pletcher, MD, MPH
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(14):1528. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.14.1528-b.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

I read with interest the analysis published recently by Giltay et al entitled “Dispositional Optimism and the Risk of Cardiovascular Death.”1 I was surprised, however, that the authors did not also report noncardiovascular and all-cause mortality in association with optimism. There may be a priori reasons to think that cardiovascular deaths are more tightly associated with optimism compared with other types of death, but given the uncertainty inherent in determining cause of death (as noted by the authors and others2), it seems prudent to analyze noncardiovascular and all-cause mortality at least as secondary outcomes. Perhaps optimistic patients were also “optimistic” about chest pain symptoms, did not report them to their physicians, and died suddenly without being diagnosed as having coronary disease at higher rates compared with less optimistic persons. This type of differential measurement error in outcome ascertainment could bias the findings in the direction observed. On the other hand, if all-cause mortality shows at least a trend in the same direction as the cardiovascular mortality analysis and noncardiovascular disease mortality shows no trend in the opposite direction, I would be reassured.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Glycemic Control and Excess Mortality in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2014;371(21):1972-1982.
ROS1 - Targeting the One Percent in Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2014;371(21):2030-2031.
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();