We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editor's Correspondence |

A Change of Reason: Medicine and the Scientific Revolution—Reply

Leonard Wartofsky, MD, MACP
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(3):369-370. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.3.370-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

In his most entertaining and scholarly letter, Diskin correctly characterizes the study of Roos et al1 as a randomized, prospective double-blind trial, and he is more than willing to accept its conclusions (in spite of the shortcomings pointed out in my editorial2), while he decries the growing use of practice guidelines. The inconsistency relates to the fact that practice guidelines are generally derived from critical analyses by acknowledged experts of not one but many randomized, prospective, double-blind trials. Thus, the basis for my recommendations is to subscribe to the larger scientific portfolio, whereas to do otherwise would clearly risk being the one “leaving early” from the scientific revolution. As an apparent student of medical history in general, and the writings of William Osler in particular, Diskin might do well to recall the admonition of Osler (that originated with Alexander Pope) to “be not the first by whom the new are tried, nor yet the last to lay the old aside.” Yes, the “standard of care” definition does relate to prudent physicians of comparable training in the same community, but prudence dictates that they primum non nocere. The reader is referred back to my editorial2 for the arguments that I believe support the traditional approach to initiation of levothyroxine therapy. However, I will reemphasize that both the early high-dose group and the control group in the study by Roos et al1 reported improvement in symptoms at the same rate—so what was gained other than risk of an adverse outcome? And if Diskin is implying that I had advocated a “monolithic” standard of care, I invite him to reread my Editorial and not rush to judgment. Finally, I will take the liberty of inferring that Diskin's characterization of “wisdom from the Ancients” constituted an ad hominem attribution and if so, I am grateful at least for the “wisdom” component.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Clinical Scenario

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
From Evidence to Recommendations