We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Choosing Wisely Recommendations Using Administrative Claims Data

Geoffrey B. Crawford, MD, MS1; Jeffrey Clyman, MD, MPH2; David S. Chiou, BA2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Anthem Inc Office of Medical Policy and Technology Assessment, Chicago, Illinois
2Anthem Inc RHI Clinical Analytics, Columbia, Maryland
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(4):564. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0342.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor The Choosing Wisely campaign marks a pivotal transformation in how physicians and clinical societies advocate for evidence-based clinical care, namely by encouraging discussion about what constitutes appropriate and necessary treatment. In an article by Rosenberg et al1 in a recent issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, 7 early Choosing Wisely recommendations were evaluated using a claims-based methodology to assess early trends in health care practice. As noted in the article, the analysis provides a valuable starting point for further evaluation of Choosing Wisely recommendations; however, such analysis is predicated on specialized expertise in developing clinically complex claims-based algorithms. In a related but separate project,2 an Anthem clinical analytics team reviewed Choosing Wisely recommendations to determine the technical feasibility and clinical appropriateness of developing a comprehensive set of objective measurements based on administrative claims data. Our feasibility project aimed to construct 2 sets of measures; the first, a set of measures to identify individuals who might benefit from conversations regarding unnecessary care (ie, individuals at risk but not yet identified as having received inappropriate care); the second, a set of measures to identify cases suggestive of scenarios outlined in Choosing Wisely recommendations (ie, inappropriate care). Of the 305 Choosing Wisely recommendations released as of May, 2014, 202 recommendations (66%) were developed into measures to identify individuals appropriate for a clinically driven decision-making intervention (ie, individuals deemed “at risk”); and 145 measures (48%) were developed to identify individuals representing the clinical scenario presented in the Choosing Wisely recommendation (ie, individuals who received inappropriate care). To assist academic researchers interested in measuring and quantifying the potential value of the Choosing Wisely campaign, complete technical specification logic of our measures are available online following an application for use under the “Choosing Wisely” header toward the bottom of the Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield web page.2


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





April 1, 2016
Daniel B. Wolfson, MHSA
1ABIM Foundation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(4):565. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0345.
April 1, 2016
Alberto Donzelli, MD; Alessandra Lafranconi, MD
1Dipartimento SSB Cure Primarie, ASL of Milan, Milan, Italy
2Università Degli Studi Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(4):565-566. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0357.
April 1, 2016
Abiy Agiro, PhD; Andrea DeVries, PhD; Alan Rosenberg, MD
1Payer and Provider Research, HealthCore Inc, Wilmington, Delaware
2Medical and Pharmacy Policy, Anthem Inc, Chicago, Illinois
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(4):566. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0371.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...