We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Benefit to Patients With Metastatic Cancer

Benoit Champigneulle, MD1; Alain Cariou, MD, PhD1; François Vincent, MD2 ; for the Groupe de recherche en réanimation respiratoire en Onco-Hématologie (GrrrOH)
[+] Author Affiliations
1Medical Intensive Care Unit, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
2Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, GHIC Le Raincy-Montfermeil, Montfermeil, France
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(1):142. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7415.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor We read with interest the article by Nabozny et al1 concerning withholding or withdrawing care from some intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We agree with much of their analysis. However, we were surprised by their conclusion about the futility of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with metastatic cancer. In our opinion, the reference cited to support this point of view2 is outdated because the patients included in the study were recruited between 2000 and 2004, and the study was also questionable in its methodology. In a meta-analysis of 42 studies including patients with cancer who underwent CPR between 1967 and 2004, Reisfield and al3 observed a global rate of hospital survival of 5.6% for patients with metastatic cancer. However, this low rate of survival masked a substantial temporal change in survival. It is fundamental to clarify that most studies about CPR and patients with cancer are old and do not take into account the progress that has been made in the care of these patients (including patients with metastases) and ICU management of patients who had cardiac arrest. Data about CPR and patients with cancer remain scarce and only 2 studies4,5 were recently published on this subject. The first focused on patients with cancer who underwent CPR during an ICU stay; if the outcome of these critically ill patients was poor (ICU and hospital survival, 7.7% and 5.8%, respectively), the only factor associated with outcome was CPR duration.4 In a recent retrospective and multicenter study including 133 patients with cancer, we found that of the 35 (26%) patients alive at ICU discharge, 32 (91%) had a good neurological outcome.5 Twenty-four (18%) patients were alive at hospital discharge, including 23 (17%) with good neurological outcomes and 1 with a severe disability. In our study,5 significant differences between ICU and non-ICU survivors only concerned previous global conditions and cardiac arrest characteristics without significant difference regarding the type of cancer or cancer status at ICU admission. Our recent data confirm that CPR can be beneficial to patients with cancer, even with metastases. We must, however, as suggested by Nabozny et al,1 be very careful with this type of resuscitation and not hesitate to reassess daily the number of organ failures to prevent the use of unreasonable and futile ICU care after initial successful CPR.1 Thus, we believe that more than the cancer status (including metastasis), some simple factors, such as performance status and cancer treatment plan, should be taken into account when deciding whether to perform initial CPR on these patients.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





January 1, 2016
Margaret L. Schwarze, MD, MPP; Michael J. Nabozny, MD; Nicole M. Steffens, MPH
1Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison2Department of Medical History and Bioethics, University of Wisconsin, Madison
1Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison
1Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison3Denver Public Health, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(1):142-143. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7418.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...